TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation Research to Address the United States Health Disadvantage
T2 - Report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop
AU - Engelgau, Michael M.
AU - Narayan, K. M.Venkat
AU - Ezzati, Majid
AU - Salicrup, Luis A.
AU - Belis, Deshiree
AU - Aron, Laudan Y.
AU - Beaglehole, Robert
AU - Beaudet, Alain
AU - Briss, Peter A.
AU - Chambers, David A.
AU - Devaux, Marion
AU - Fiscella, Kevin
AU - Gottlieb, Michael
AU - Hakkinen, Unto
AU - Henderson, Rain
AU - Hennis, Anselm J.
AU - Hochman, Judith S.
AU - Jan, Stephen
AU - Koroshetz, Walter J.
AU - Mackenbach, Johan P.
AU - Marmot, M. G.
AU - Martikainen, Pekka
AU - McClellan, Mark
AU - Meyers, David
AU - Parsons, Polly E.
AU - Rehnberg, Clas
AU - Sanghavi, Darshak
AU - Sidney, Stephen
AU - Siega-Riz, Anna Maria
AU - Straus, Sharon
AU - Woolf, Steven H.
AU - Constant, Stephanie
AU - Creazzo, Tony L.
AU - de Jesus, Janet M.
AU - Gavini, Nara
AU - Lerner, Norma B.
AU - Mishoe, Helena O.
AU - Nelson, Cheryl
AU - Peprah, Emmanuel
AU - Punturieri, Antonello
AU - Sampson, Uchechukwu
AU - Tracy, Rachael L.
AU - Mensah, George A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The Think Tank meeting was supported entirely by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Manuscript development was led by U.S. government employees of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute as part of their normal duties.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Four decades ago, U.S. life expectancy was within the same range as other high-income peer countries. However, during the past decades, the United States has fared worse in many key health domains resulting in shorter life expectancy and poorer health—a health disadvantage. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a panel of national and international health experts and stakeholders for a Think Tank meeting to explore the U.S. health disadvantage and to seek specific recommendations for implementation research opportunities for heart, lung, blood, and sleep disorders. Recommendations for National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute consideration were made in several areas including understanding the drivers of the disadvantage, identifying potential solutions, creating strategic partnerships with common goals, and finally enhancing and fostering a research workforce for implementation research. Key recommendations included exploring why the United States is doing better for health indicators in a few areas compared with peer countries; targeting populations across the entire socioeconomic spectrum with interventions at all levels in order to prevent missing a substantial proportion of the disadvantage; assuring partnership have high-level goals that can create systemic change through collective impact; and finally, increasing opportunities for implementation research training to meet the current needs. Connecting with the research community at large and building on ongoing research efforts will be an important strategy. Broad partnerships and collaboration across the social, political, economic, and private sectors and all civil society will be critical—not only for implementation research but also for implementing the findings to have the desired population impact. Developing the relevant knowledge to tackle the U.S. health disadvantage is the necessary first step to improve U.S. health outcomes.
AB - Four decades ago, U.S. life expectancy was within the same range as other high-income peer countries. However, during the past decades, the United States has fared worse in many key health domains resulting in shorter life expectancy and poorer health—a health disadvantage. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a panel of national and international health experts and stakeholders for a Think Tank meeting to explore the U.S. health disadvantage and to seek specific recommendations for implementation research opportunities for heart, lung, blood, and sleep disorders. Recommendations for National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute consideration were made in several areas including understanding the drivers of the disadvantage, identifying potential solutions, creating strategic partnerships with common goals, and finally enhancing and fostering a research workforce for implementation research. Key recommendations included exploring why the United States is doing better for health indicators in a few areas compared with peer countries; targeting populations across the entire socioeconomic spectrum with interventions at all levels in order to prevent missing a substantial proportion of the disadvantage; assuring partnership have high-level goals that can create systemic change through collective impact; and finally, increasing opportunities for implementation research training to meet the current needs. Connecting with the research community at large and building on ongoing research efforts will be an important strategy. Broad partnerships and collaboration across the social, political, economic, and private sectors and all civil society will be critical—not only for implementation research but also for implementing the findings to have the desired population impact. Developing the relevant knowledge to tackle the U.S. health disadvantage is the necessary first step to improve U.S. health outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046168268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046168268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gheart.2018.03.003
DO - 10.1016/j.gheart.2018.03.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 29716847
AN - SCOPUS:85046168268
SN - 2211-8160
VL - 13
SP - 65
EP - 72
JO - Global Heart
JF - Global Heart
IS - 2
ER -