Improved lower bounds on the randomized complexity of graph properties

Amit Chakrabarti, Subhash Khot

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

We prove a lower bound of ω (n4/3 log1/3 n) on the randomized decision tree complexity of any nontrivial monotone n-vertex bipartite graph property, thereby improving the previous bound of ω(n 4/3) due to Hajnal [H91]. Our proof works by improving a probabilistic argument in that paper, which also improves a graph packing lemma proved there. By a result of Gröger [G92] our complexity lower bound carries over from bipartite to general monotone n-vertex graph properties. Graph packing being a well-studied subject in its own right, our improved packing lemma and the probabilistic technique used to prove it, may be of independent interest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAutomata, Languages and Programming - 28th International Colloquium, ICALP 2001, Proceedings
EditorsFernando Orejas, Paul G. Spirakis, Jan van Leeuwen
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages285-296
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)3540422870, 9783540422877
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Event28th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, ICALP 2001 - Crete, Greece
Duration: Jul 8 2001Jul 12 2001

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume2076 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Other

Other28th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, ICALP 2001
Country/TerritoryGreece
CityCrete
Period7/8/017/12/01

Keywords

  • Decision tree complexity
  • Gaph packing
  • Mnotone graph properties
  • Pobabilistic method
  • Rn-domized complexity
  • Rndomized algorithms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • General Computer Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improved lower bounds on the randomized complexity of graph properties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this