TY - JOUR
T1 - In search of a Paleolithic Silk Road in Kazakhstan
AU - Iovita, Radu
AU - Varis, Aristeidis
AU - Namen, Abay
AU - Cuthbertson, Patrick
AU - Taimagambetov, Zhaken
AU - Miller, Christopher E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/9/10
Y1 - 2020/9/10
N2 - Paleoanthropological data suggest that the Late Pleistocene was a time of population contact and possibly dispersal in Central Asia. Geographic and paleoclimatic data suggest that a natural corridor through Kazakhstan linked areas to the north and east (Siberia, China) to those further to the west and south (Uzbekistan), much like a Paleolithic Silk Road. We review the known Pleistocene archaeology and paleoclimatic setting of this region and provide a geoarchaeological framework for contextualizing preliminary survey results of the PALAEOSILKROAD project's first three seasons of fieldwork. We discuss some systematic biases in three geomorphic and sedimentary archives: karst, loess, and spring deposits, specifying ways in which these biases might determine the kinds of data that are extractable by systematic survey. In particular, we caution about the possibility of future systematic biases in chronology that could come about as a result of the type of geomorphic context in which the sites are recovered. We conclude with recommendations for future work in the area.
AB - Paleoanthropological data suggest that the Late Pleistocene was a time of population contact and possibly dispersal in Central Asia. Geographic and paleoclimatic data suggest that a natural corridor through Kazakhstan linked areas to the north and east (Siberia, China) to those further to the west and south (Uzbekistan), much like a Paleolithic Silk Road. We review the known Pleistocene archaeology and paleoclimatic setting of this region and provide a geoarchaeological framework for contextualizing preliminary survey results of the PALAEOSILKROAD project's first three seasons of fieldwork. We discuss some systematic biases in three geomorphic and sedimentary archives: karst, loess, and spring deposits, specifying ways in which these biases might determine the kinds of data that are extractable by systematic survey. In particular, we caution about the possibility of future systematic biases in chronology that could come about as a result of the type of geomorphic context in which the sites are recovered. We conclude with recommendations for future work in the area.
KW - Central Asia
KW - Geoarchaeology
KW - Paleolithic
KW - Systematic survey
KW - Taphonomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080148534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85080148534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.02.023
DO - 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.02.023
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85080148534
SN - 1040-6182
VL - 559
SP - 119
EP - 132
JO - Quaternary International
JF - Quaternary International
ER -