In vitro and in vivo effects of isolated fractions of Brazilian propolis on caries development

Mitsue F. Hayacibara, Hyun Koo, Pedro L. Rosalen, Simone Duarte, Eliane M. Franco, William H. Bowen, Masaharu Ikegaki, Jaime A. Cury

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Recently, two chemically different types of Brazilian propolis (type-3 and -12) were shown to have cariostatic properties. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of their isolated fractions on mutans streptococci viability, glucosyltransferases (GTFs) activity and caries development in rats. The ethanolic extracts of propolis (EEPs) were serially fractionated into hexane (H-fr), chloroform, ethyl acetate, and ethanol. The ability of the four fractions and EEP to inhibit Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus growth and adherence to a glass surface was examined. The effect on GTFs B and C activity was also determined. For the caries study, 60 Wistar rats infected with Streptococcus sobrinus were treated topically twice daily as follows: (1) EEP type-3, (2) H-fr type-3, (3) EEP type-12, (4) H-fr type-12, and (5) control. In general, the H-fr from both types of propolis showed the highest antibacterial activity and GTFs inhibition. Furthermore, the EEP and H-fr type-3 and -12 were equally effective in reducing dental caries in rats. The data suggest that the putative cariostatic compounds of propolis type-3 and -12 are mostly non-polar; and H-fr should be the fraction of choice for identifying further potentially novel anti-caries agents.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)110-115
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Ethnopharmacology
    Issue number1-3
    StatePublished - Oct 3 2005


    • Antimicrobial activity
    • Caries
    • Glucosyltransferase
    • Propolis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pharmacology
    • Drug Discovery


    Dive into the research topics of 'In vitro and in vivo effects of isolated fractions of Brazilian propolis on caries development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this