TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of Abutment Fabrication Method on 3D Fit at the Implant-Abutment Connection
AU - RamaIho, Ilana
AU - Witek, Lukasz
AU - Coelho, Paulo G.
AU - Bergamo, Edmara
AU - Pegoraro, Luiz Fernando
AU - Bonfante, Estevam A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - PURPOSE: To three-dimensionally evaluate the internal fit at the implant-abutment interface of abutments fabricated with different workflows using a combination of the silicone replica technique and microcomputed tomography (μCT).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty abutments were fabricated to restore internal-connection implants and were divided into three groups according to fabrication method: (1) full digital (abutment machined using CAD/CAM system); (2) Ti-Base (prefabricated standard Ti-Base abutments); and (3) UCLA (UCLA-type abutments) (n = 10/group). Linear and volume measurements were performed to assess the internal misfit using a silicone replica of the implant-abutment interface misfit area, which was three-dimensionally reconstructed after μCT. The internal discrepancies in three different regions of interest (Gap
superior, Gap
marginal, and Gap
center) were assessed. Data were statistically evaluated using ANOVA and Tukey test (P < .05).
RESULTS: Ti-Base and UCLA abutments presented significantly lower misfit volume (0.49 mm
3, 95% CI: ± 0.045 mm
3 and 0.48 mm
3, 95% CI: ± 0.045 mm
3, respectively) and mean internal gap (25.20 μm, 95% CI: ± 3.14 μm and 27.97 μm, 95% CI: ± 3.14 μm, respectively) than the full digital group (0.70 mm
3, 95% CI: ± 0.045 mm
3; 34.90 μm, 95% CI: ± 3.14 μm) (P < .001), but did not differ from each other (P = .825). While Gap
center was significantly higher in the full digital group (P < .001), Gap
superior and Gap
marginal did not demonstrate significant differences among groups. All regions were statistically similar within groups, except for Gap
center in the full digital group, which exhibited higher mean values compared to the other regions (P = .000). The 3D measurements for quantification of internal discrepancy were strongly associated with the 2D measurements.
CONCLUSION: Ti-Base and UCLA abutments exhibited better internal fit at the implant-abutment interfaces compared to a fully digitalized workflow (CAD/CAM custom abutments).
AB - PURPOSE: To three-dimensionally evaluate the internal fit at the implant-abutment interface of abutments fabricated with different workflows using a combination of the silicone replica technique and microcomputed tomography (μCT).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty abutments were fabricated to restore internal-connection implants and were divided into three groups according to fabrication method: (1) full digital (abutment machined using CAD/CAM system); (2) Ti-Base (prefabricated standard Ti-Base abutments); and (3) UCLA (UCLA-type abutments) (n = 10/group). Linear and volume measurements were performed to assess the internal misfit using a silicone replica of the implant-abutment interface misfit area, which was three-dimensionally reconstructed after μCT. The internal discrepancies in three different regions of interest (Gap
superior, Gap
marginal, and Gap
center) were assessed. Data were statistically evaluated using ANOVA and Tukey test (P < .05).
RESULTS: Ti-Base and UCLA abutments presented significantly lower misfit volume (0.49 mm
3, 95% CI: ± 0.045 mm
3 and 0.48 mm
3, 95% CI: ± 0.045 mm
3, respectively) and mean internal gap (25.20 μm, 95% CI: ± 3.14 μm and 27.97 μm, 95% CI: ± 3.14 μm, respectively) than the full digital group (0.70 mm
3, 95% CI: ± 0.045 mm
3; 34.90 μm, 95% CI: ± 3.14 μm) (P < .001), but did not differ from each other (P = .825). While Gap
center was significantly higher in the full digital group (P < .001), Gap
superior and Gap
marginal did not demonstrate significant differences among groups. All regions were statistically similar within groups, except for Gap
center in the full digital group, which exhibited higher mean values compared to the other regions (P = .000). The 3D measurements for quantification of internal discrepancy were strongly associated with the 2D measurements.
CONCLUSION: Ti-Base and UCLA abutments exhibited better internal fit at the implant-abutment interfaces compared to a fully digitalized workflow (CAD/CAM custom abutments).
KW - Computer-Aided Design
KW - Dental Abutments
KW - Dental Implants
KW - Titanium
KW - X-Ray Microtomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097481429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097481429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11607/ijp.6574
DO - 10.11607/ijp.6574
M3 - Article
C2 - 33284906
AN - SCOPUS:85097481429
SN - 0893-2174
VL - 33
SP - 641
EP - 647
JO - International Journal of Prosthodontics
JF - International Journal of Prosthodontics
IS - 6
ER -