TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants
AU - Eliasa, Carlos Nelson
AU - Rocha, Felipe Assis
AU - Nascimento, Ana Lucia
AU - Coelho, Paulo Guilherme
N1 - Funding Information:
The financial support of the Brazilian government (CNPq and FAPERJ) is gratefully acknowledged. No financial support was received from the industry.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - The primary stability of dental implants has been investigated before, but a study of the influence of implant shape, size and surface morphology (machined, acid etched or anodized), surgical technique (press-fitor under sized) and substrate (naturalor simulated bone) on the primary stability of dental implants has not been reported. The present work intends to fill this gap. In this work, six different dental implants were inserted into and removed from synthetic and natural bone while measuring the torque. A total of 255 dental implants with three shapes, foursizes and three surface to pographies were inserted into pigrib, PTFE and polyurethane. The implant sites were prepared using straight and tapered drills. The primary stability was estimated from the maximum insertion torque. Comparisons between samples were based on the maximum insertion torque (MIT), the maximum removal torque (MRT) and the torque ratio (TR = MRT/MIT) The insertion torque in to pig ribs showed larger dispersion. Allpara-meters (shape, size and surface morphology of the implant, surgical technique and substrate type) were found to have a significant influence on primary stability. The insertion of a tapered implant requires a higher torque than the insertion of a straight implant. Surface treatments improve the primary stability. The influence of the surgical technique is smaller than that of implant size and shape. The highest insertion torque was that of anostability of dental implants is highly dependent on implant design, surgical technique and substrate type.
AB - The primary stability of dental implants has been investigated before, but a study of the influence of implant shape, size and surface morphology (machined, acid etched or anodized), surgical technique (press-fitor under sized) and substrate (naturalor simulated bone) on the primary stability of dental implants has not been reported. The present work intends to fill this gap. In this work, six different dental implants were inserted into and removed from synthetic and natural bone while measuring the torque. A total of 255 dental implants with three shapes, foursizes and three surface to pographies were inserted into pigrib, PTFE and polyurethane. The implant sites were prepared using straight and tapered drills. The primary stability was estimated from the maximum insertion torque. Comparisons between samples were based on the maximum insertion torque (MIT), the maximum removal torque (MRT) and the torque ratio (TR = MRT/MIT) The insertion torque in to pig ribs showed larger dispersion. Allpara-meters (shape, size and surface morphology of the implant, surgical technique and substrate type) were found to have a significant influence on primary stability. The insertion of a tapered implant requires a higher torque than the insertion of a straight implant. Surface treatments improve the primary stability. The influence of the surgical technique is smaller than that of implant size and shape. The highest insertion torque was that of anostability of dental implants is highly dependent on implant design, surgical technique and substrate type.
KW - Dental implants
KW - Insertion torque
KW - Primary stability
KW - Removal torque
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872688484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872688484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 23182386
AN - SCOPUS:84872688484
SN - 1751-6161
VL - 16
SP - 169
EP - 180
JO - Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
JF - Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
IS - 1
ER -