TY - JOUR
T1 - Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination
T2 - The effects of applicant sex and information type on preliminary employment decisions
AU - Heilman, Madeline E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by BSRG Grant RR07062, awarded by the Biomedical Research Support Grant Program, Division of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health. The author thanks Melanie H. Stopeck and Maureen McDermitt for their assistance with data analysis and comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. Requests for reprints should be sent to Dr. Madeline E. Heilman, Department of Psychology, New York State University, 6 Washington Place, NY 10003.
PY - 1984/4
Y1 - 1984/4
N2 - To investigate the idea that providing information about a job applicant's past performance can avert sex discrimination in preliminary employment decisions, an experiment was conducted in which both Applicant Sex and Type of Information were varied. As predicted, highly job-relevant information was found to produce less differential treatment of male and female applicants than did information of low job relevance or no information at all. Also as predicted, the type of information provided had more impact on reactions to female applicants than male applicants, with high job-relevance information producing the most favorable responses and, unexpectedly, low job-relevance information producing the least favorable responses to female applicants. Additional results suggested that these effects were mediated by the degree to which female job applicants were characterized by stereotypic attributes. The findings are interpreted as supportive of the idea that undermining the information value of sex stereotypes as a basis of inference about the attributes of a given woman can function to reduce sex discrimination in employment settings.
AB - To investigate the idea that providing information about a job applicant's past performance can avert sex discrimination in preliminary employment decisions, an experiment was conducted in which both Applicant Sex and Type of Information were varied. As predicted, highly job-relevant information was found to produce less differential treatment of male and female applicants than did information of low job relevance or no information at all. Also as predicted, the type of information provided had more impact on reactions to female applicants than male applicants, with high job-relevance information producing the most favorable responses and, unexpectedly, low job-relevance information producing the least favorable responses to female applicants. Additional results suggested that these effects were mediated by the degree to which female job applicants were characterized by stereotypic attributes. The findings are interpreted as supportive of the idea that undermining the information value of sex stereotypes as a basis of inference about the attributes of a given woman can function to reduce sex discrimination in employment settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2642582208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2642582208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90019-9
DO - 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90019-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:2642582208
SN - 0030-5073
VL - 33
SP - 174
EP - 186
JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
IS - 2
ER -