@article{63fef0ff4c4545009bef0d825fd96286,
title = "Institutions, partisanship, and inequality in the long run",
author = "Kenneth Scheve and David Stasavage",
note = "Funding Information: *We would like to thank thomas Piketty for useful suggestions at the time we were developing this article, as well as for sharing the data on top income shares. Jesper roine and daniel Waldenstr{\"o}m kindly provided us with the data from their paper on top incomes in sweden, and Jonas Pontusson provided us with union density data. We would also like to thank Jim alt, neal Beck, thad dunning, Miriam golden, stephen haber, James honaker, torben Iversen, Peter Katzenstein, andrew leigh, david Mayhew, adam Przeworski, ron rogowski, david soskice, Peter swenson, daniel Walden-str{\"o}m, three anonymous referees, and seminar participants at columbia, new york university, notre dame, Penn state, Princeton, stanford, Wisconsin, and yale for comments on an initial draft. We are grateful to the Institution for social and Policy studies and MacMillan center for International and area studies at yale university for financial support for this project. Xiaobo lu and Kaj thomsson provided invaluable research assistance. 1 centralized wage bargaining will arguably affect earnings inequality and thus household income inequality to the extent that earnings represent a sizable portion of a household{\textquoteright}s income. While recognizing this distinction, throughout this article we refer more simply to the effect of centralized wage bargaining on “income inequality.” World Politics 61, no. 2 (april 2009), 215–53 copyright {\textcopyright} 2009 trustees of Princeton university 10.1017/s0043887109000094",
year = "2009",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1017/S0043887109000094",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "215--253",
journal = "World Politics",
issn = "0043-8871",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",
}