Integrating rigor and relevance in public administration scholarship: The contribution of narrative inquiry

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

A traditional view of scholarly quality defines rigor as the application of method and assumes an implicit connection with relevance. But as an applied field, public administration requires explicit attention to both rigor and relevance. Interpretive scholars' notions of rigor demand an explicit inclusion of relevance as an integral aspect of quality. As one form of interpretive research, narrative inquiry illuminates how this can be done. Appreciating this contribution requires a deeper knowledge of the logic of narrative inquiry, an acknowledgement of the diversity of narrative approaches, and attention to the implications for judging its quality. We use our story about community-based leadership research to develop and illustrate this argument.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)286-300
Number of pages15
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume65
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Integrating rigor and relevance in public administration scholarship: The contribution of narrative inquiry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this