TY - JOUR
T1 - Inter-brain synchrony in teams predicts collective performance
AU - Reinero, Diego A.
AU - Dikker, Suzanne
AU - Van Bavel, Jay J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Despite decades of research in economics and psychology attempting to identify ingredients that make up successful teams, neuroscientists have only just begun to study how multiple brains interact. Recent research has shown that people's brain activity becomes synchronized with others' (inter-brain synchrony) during social engagement. However, little is known as to whether inter-brain synchrony relates to collective behavior within teams. Here, we merge the nascent field of group neuroscience with the extant literature of team dynamics and collective performance. We recruited 174 participants in groups of 4 and randomly assigned them to complete a series of problem-solving tasks either independently or as a team, while simultaneously recording each person's brain activity using an electroencephalography hyperscanning setup. This design allowed us to examine the relationship between group identification and inter-brain synchrony in explaining collective performance. As expected, teammates identified more strongly with one another, cooperated more on an economic game, and outperformed the average individual on most problem-solving tasks. Crucially, inter-brain synchrony, but not self-reported group identification, predicted collective performance among teams. These results suggest that inter-brain synchrony can be informative in understanding collective performance among teams where self-report measures may fail to capture behavior.
AB - Despite decades of research in economics and psychology attempting to identify ingredients that make up successful teams, neuroscientists have only just begun to study how multiple brains interact. Recent research has shown that people's brain activity becomes synchronized with others' (inter-brain synchrony) during social engagement. However, little is known as to whether inter-brain synchrony relates to collective behavior within teams. Here, we merge the nascent field of group neuroscience with the extant literature of team dynamics and collective performance. We recruited 174 participants in groups of 4 and randomly assigned them to complete a series of problem-solving tasks either independently or as a team, while simultaneously recording each person's brain activity using an electroencephalography hyperscanning setup. This design allowed us to examine the relationship between group identification and inter-brain synchrony in explaining collective performance. As expected, teammates identified more strongly with one another, cooperated more on an economic game, and outperformed the average individual on most problem-solving tasks. Crucially, inter-brain synchrony, but not self-reported group identification, predicted collective performance among teams. These results suggest that inter-brain synchrony can be informative in understanding collective performance among teams where self-report measures may fail to capture behavior.
KW - Collective performance
KW - Group identification
KW - Hyperscanning
KW - Inter-brain synchrony
KW - Teams
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099867338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099867338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/scan/nsaa135
DO - 10.1093/scan/nsaa135
M3 - Article
C2 - 32991728
AN - SCOPUS:85099867338
SN - 1749-5016
VL - 16
SP - 43
EP - 57
JO - Social cognitive and affective neuroscience
JF - Social cognitive and affective neuroscience
IS - 1-2
ER -