TY - JOUR
T1 - Interfacial pattern formation far from equilibrium
AU - Ben-Jacob, E.
AU - Garik, P.
AU - Grier, D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements ~ We thank David Iiessler for USC-ful discussions, A. Ben-Jacob for her assistance, and R. Kupferman for his comments on the manuscript. This research was partially supported by NSF Grant DMR 8608305, the Israeli Academy of Science. the Tel-Aviv University Grant for Basic Research, aud the Petroleum Research Fund of the American Chemical Society. We further acknowledge the NSF Office of Supercomputing for providing time on the San Diego Supercomputing Center Cray. E. Ben-Jacob is a Bat-Sheva Fellow.
PY - 1987
Y1 - 1987
N2 - Over the past few years diffusion-controlled systems have been shown to share a common set of interfacial morphologies. The singular nature of the microscopic dynamics of surface tension and kinetic growth far from equilibrium are critical to morphology selection, with special importance attributed to the anisotropy of these effects. The morphologies which develop can be organized via a morphology diagram according to the driving force and the effective anisotropy. We focus on the properties of the dense-branching morphology (DBM) which appears for sufficiently weak effective anisotropy, and the nature of morphology transitions between the DBM and dendritic growth stabilized by either surface tension or kinetic effects. The DBM is studied in the Hele-Shaw cell, and its structure analyzed by linear stability analysis. A comparison is made between the power spectrum of the structure and the stability analysis. We then provide a detailed account of the morphology diagram and morphology transitions in an anisotropic Hele-Shaw cell. Theoretically the question of morphology transitions is addressed within the boundary-layer model by computing selected velocities as a function of the undercooling for different values of the surface tension and the kinetic term. We argue that the fastest growing morphology is selected whether it is the DBM, surface tension dendrites, or kinetic dendrites. A comparison is made with our experimental results in electrochemical deposition for the correspondence between growth velocities and morphology transitions.
AB - Over the past few years diffusion-controlled systems have been shown to share a common set of interfacial morphologies. The singular nature of the microscopic dynamics of surface tension and kinetic growth far from equilibrium are critical to morphology selection, with special importance attributed to the anisotropy of these effects. The morphologies which develop can be organized via a morphology diagram according to the driving force and the effective anisotropy. We focus on the properties of the dense-branching morphology (DBM) which appears for sufficiently weak effective anisotropy, and the nature of morphology transitions between the DBM and dendritic growth stabilized by either surface tension or kinetic effects. The DBM is studied in the Hele-Shaw cell, and its structure analyzed by linear stability analysis. A comparison is made between the power spectrum of the structure and the stability analysis. We then provide a detailed account of the morphology diagram and morphology transitions in an anisotropic Hele-Shaw cell. Theoretically the question of morphology transitions is addressed within the boundary-layer model by computing selected velocities as a function of the undercooling for different values of the surface tension and the kinetic term. We argue that the fastest growing morphology is selected whether it is the DBM, surface tension dendrites, or kinetic dendrites. A comparison is made with our experimental results in electrochemical deposition for the correspondence between growth velocities and morphology transitions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023536530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023536530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0749-6036(87)90190-X
DO - 10.1016/0749-6036(87)90190-X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0023536530
SN - 0749-6036
VL - 3
SP - 599
EP - 615
JO - Superlattices and Microstructures
JF - Superlattices and Microstructures
IS - 6
ER -