Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity

Anne Maass, Russell D. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Two experiments investigated whether minority influence and conformity operate by the same or by different processes. It was predicted that subjects who were simultaneously exposed to a majority and a minority opinion would move towards the minority in private but towards the majority in public. The results of Experiment 1 supported this hypothesis. Experiment 2 investigated three hypotheses predicting that (1) the above interaction would be replicated, (2) minorities would trigger more arguments and counter‐arguments, and (3) cognitive activity would mediate internalization but not compliance. Hypotheses 1 and 3 were supported. The second hypothesis was not supported. However, minorities were found to trigger more arguments and fewer counter‐arguments than majorities. The results were interpreted as supporting the dual process model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-215
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this