Is there a selection bias in roll call votes? Evidence from the European Parliament

Simon Hix, Abdul Noury, Gerard Roland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We examine the magnitude and significance of selection bias in roll call votes. Prior to 2009, all recorded (roll call) votes in the European Parliament had to be requested explicitly by European Political Groups. Since 2009, a roll call vote has been mandatory on all final legislative votes. We exploit that change in the rules and compare differences between final legislative votes, amendment votes and non-legislative votes before and after 2009, using a difference-in-differences approach with extensive controls. Using data from the Sixth (2004–2009) to Seventh (2009–2014) European Parliaments, we fail to find any large differences in voting cohesion for the main political groups. We find even less significance when we control for changes in parliamentary membership between those two periods. The results suggest that selection biases in the European Parliament associated with strategic choices are negligible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-228
Number of pages18
JournalPublic Choice
Volume176
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Keywords

  • Difference in difference estimation
  • European Parliament
  • Natural experiment
  • Party discipline
  • Roll call votes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is there a selection bias in roll call votes? Evidence from the European Parliament'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this