Is this a coincidence? The role of examples in fostering a need for proof

Orly Buchbinder, Orit Zaslavsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is widely known that students often treat examples that satisfy a certain universal statement as sufficient for showing that the statement is true without recognizing the conventional need for a general proof. Our study focuses on special cases in which examples satisfy certain universal statements, either true or false in a special type of mathematical task, which we term "Is this a coincidence?". In each task of this type, a geometrical example was chosen carefully in a way that appears to illustrate a more general and potentially surprising phenomenon, which can be seen as a conjecture. In this paper, we articulate some design principles underlying the choice of examples for this type of task, and examine how such tasks may trigger a need for proof. Our findings point to two different kinds of ways of dealing with the task. One is characterized by a doubtful disposition regarding the generality of the observed phenomenon. The other kind of response was overconfidence in the conjecture even when it was false. In both cases, a need for "proof" was evoked; however, this need did not necessarily lead to a valid proof. We used this type of task with two different groups: capable high school students and experienced secondary mathematics teachers. The findings were similar in both groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-281
Number of pages13
JournalZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Mathematics(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is this a coincidence? The role of examples in fostering a need for proof'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this