La massimizzazione del profitto? Un'idea controproducente. Due contributi recenti dall'economia e dal diritto societario

Translated title of the contribution: Shareholder value maximization is a counterproductive idea: Two recent insights from economics and corporate law

Di Simone De Colle

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Criticism on the shareholder value ideology used to be a marginal conversation held by a few "outsiders" of mainstream business scholarship, such as philosophers and business ethicists. Interestingly, in the last few years this debate has been enriched by the contributions of some "insiders", such as the feminist economist Julie Nelson, who introduced the concept of Economics for Humans (2006), and the renowned corporate law professor Lynn Stout, who maintains in her The Shareholder Value Myth (2012) that shareholder value maximization "lacks solid grounding in corporate law, corporate economics, or the empirical evidence". I will illustrate the key points of these two contributions and reflect on their importance in light of Stakeholder theory.

    Translated title of the contributionShareholder value maximization is a counterproductive idea: Two recent insights from economics and corporate law
    Original languageItalian
    Pages (from-to)19-26
    Number of pages8
    JournalNotizie di Politeia
    Volume31
    Issue number117
    StatePublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • Metaphors in science
    • Profit maximization
    • Shareholder primacy
    • Stakeholder theory

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Philosophy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Shareholder value maximization is a counterproductive idea: Two recent insights from economics and corporate law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this