Labour market structure and inequality: A comparison of Italy and the U.S

Christopher J. Flinn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Markets with rigid labour regulations and centralized wage setting are often thought to be inefficient but egalitarian. Using a model of off- and on-the-job search and event-history, individual-level data for Italy and the U.S., we show that while the cross-sectional wage distributions of young Italian males are much more compressed than are the comparable distributions for young white U.S. males, the estimated search model implies that the distribution of lifetime welfare is no more disperse in the U.S. than it is in Italy. Our model implies that the high frequency of movements between labour market states leads to both a relatively equitable distribution of "long run" welfare in the U.S. and a high level of cross-sectional inequality.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)611-645
    Number of pages35
    JournalReview of Economic Studies
    Issue number3
    StatePublished - Jul 2002

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics


    Dive into the research topics of 'Labour market structure and inequality: A comparison of Italy and the U.S'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this