Language barriers between nurses and patients: A scoping review

Lauren Gerchow, Larissa R. Burka, Sarah Miner, Allison Squires

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


Objective: Global migration and linguistic diversity are at record highs, making healthcare language barriers more prevalent. Nurses, often the first contact with patients in the healthcare system, can improve outcomes including safety and satisfaction through how they manage language barriers. This review aimed to explore how research has examined the nursing workforce with respect to language barriers. Methods: A systematic scoping review of the literature was conducted using four databases. An iterative coding approach was used for data analysis. Study quality was appraised using the CASP checklists. Results: 48 studies representing 16 countries were included. Diverse healthcare settings were represented, with the inpatient setting most commonly studied. The majority of studies were qualitative. Coding produced 4 themes: (1) Interpreter Use/Misuse, (2) Barriers to and Facilitators of Quality Care, (3) Cultural Competence, and (4) Interventions. Conclusion: Generally, nurses noted like experiences and applied similar strategies regardless of setting, country, or language. Language barriers complicated care delivery while increasing stress and workload. Practice Implications: This review identified gaps which future research can investigate to better support nurses working through language barriers. Similarly, healthcare and government leaders have opportunities to enact policies which address bilingual proficiency, workload, and interpreter use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)534-553
Number of pages20
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 2021


  • Communication barriers
  • Culture
  • Health care quality
  • Language
  • Nursing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Language barriers between nurses and patients: A scoping review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this