TY - JOUR
T1 - Laryngeal features are phonetically abstract
T2 - Mismatch negativity evidence from Arabic, English, and Russian
AU - Schluter, Kevin T.
AU - Politzer-Ahles, Stephen
AU - Al Kaabi, Meera
AU - Almeida, Diogo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Schluter, Politzer-Ahles, Al Kaabi and Almeida.
PY - 2017/5/15
Y1 - 2017/5/15
N2 - Many theories of phonology assume that the sound structure of language is made up of distinctive features, but there is considerable debate about how much articulatory detail distinctive features encode in long-term memory. Laryngeal features such as voicing provide a unique window into this question: while many languages have two-way contrasts that can be given a simple binary feature account [±VOICE], the precise articulatory details underlying these contrasts can vary significantly across languages. Here, we investigate a series of two-way voicing contrasts in English, Arabic, and Russian, three languages that implement their voicing contrasts very differently at the articulatory-phonetic level. In three event-related potential experiments contrasting English, Arabic, and Russian fricatives along with Russian stops, we observe a consistent pattern of asymmetric mismatch negativity (MMN) effects that is compatible with an articulatorily abstract and cross-linguistically uniform way of marking two-way voicing contrasts, as opposed to an articulatorily precise and cross-linguistically diverse way of encoding them. Regardless of whether a language is theorized to encode [VOICE] over [SPREAD GLOTTIS], the data is consistent with a universal marking of the [SPREAD GLOTTIS] feature.
AB - Many theories of phonology assume that the sound structure of language is made up of distinctive features, but there is considerable debate about how much articulatory detail distinctive features encode in long-term memory. Laryngeal features such as voicing provide a unique window into this question: while many languages have two-way contrasts that can be given a simple binary feature account [±VOICE], the precise articulatory details underlying these contrasts can vary significantly across languages. Here, we investigate a series of two-way voicing contrasts in English, Arabic, and Russian, three languages that implement their voicing contrasts very differently at the articulatory-phonetic level. In three event-related potential experiments contrasting English, Arabic, and Russian fricatives along with Russian stops, we observe a consistent pattern of asymmetric mismatch negativity (MMN) effects that is compatible with an articulatorily abstract and cross-linguistically uniform way of marking two-way voicing contrasts, as opposed to an articulatorily precise and cross-linguistically diverse way of encoding them. Regardless of whether a language is theorized to encode [VOICE] over [SPREAD GLOTTIS], the data is consistent with a universal marking of the [SPREAD GLOTTIS] feature.
KW - Aspiration
KW - Distinctive feature
KW - Laryngeal state
KW - Mismatch negativity
KW - Phoneme
KW - Phonological feature
KW - Spread glottis
KW - Voicing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019649840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019649840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00746
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00746
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85019649840
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
IS - MAY
M1 - 746
ER -