LEAP-UCD-2017 comparison of centrifuge test results

Bruce L. Kutter; Trevor J. Carey; Nicholas Stone; Bao Li Zheng; Andreas Gavras; Majid T. Manzari; Mourad Zeghal; Tarek Abdoun; Evangelia Korre; Sandra Escoffier; Stuart K. Haigh; Gopal S.P. Madabhushi; Srikanth S.C. Madabhushi; Wen Yi Hung; Ting Wei Liao; Dong Soo Kim; Seong Nam Kim; Jeong Gon Ha; Nam Ryong Kim; Mitsu Okamura; Asri Nurani Sjafruddin; Tetsuo Tobita; Kyohei Ueda; Ruben Vargas; Yan Guo Zhou; Kai Liu

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_4

LEAP-UCD-2017 comparison of centrifuge test results

Bruce L. Kutter, Trevor J. Carey, Nicholas Stone, Bao Li Zheng, Andreas Gavras, Majid T. Manzari, Mourad Zeghal, Tarek Abdoun, Evangelia Korre, Sandra Escoffier, Stuart K. Haigh, Gopal S.P. Madabhushi, Srikanth S.C. Madabhushi, Wen Yi Hung, Ting Wei Liao, Dong Soo Kim, Seong Nam Kim, Jeong Gon Ha, Nam Ryong Kim, Mitsu OkamuraAsri Nurani Sjafruddin, Tetsuo Tobita, Kyohei Ueda, Ruben Vargas, Yan Guo Zhou, Kai Liu

Civil Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

This paper compares experimental results from every facility for LEAP-UCD-2017. The specified experiment consisted of a submerged medium-dense clean sand with a 5-degree slope subjected to 1 Hz ramped sine wave base motion in a rigid container. The ground motions and soil density were intentionally varied from experiment to experiment in hopes of defining the slope of the relational trend between response (e.g., displacement, pore pressure), intensity of shaking, and density or relative density. This paper is also intended to serve as a useful starting point for overview of the experimental results and to help others find specific experiments if they want to select a subset for further analysis. The results of the experiments show significant differences between each other, but the responses show a significant correlation, R² ~ 0.7-0.8, to the known variation of the input parameters.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading
Subtitle of host publication	LEAP-UCD-2017
Publisher	Springer International Publishing
Pages	69-103
Number of pages	35
ISBN (Electronic)	9783030228187
ISBN (Print)	9783030228170
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_4
State	Published - Nov 15 2019

Keywords

Centrifuge model test
Lateral spreading
LEAP
Liquefaction
Reproducibility
Round robin test
Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Earth and Planetary Sciences
General Physics and Astronomy
General Engineering
General Environmental Science
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_4

Cite this

Kutter, B. L., Carey, T. J., Stone, N., Zheng, B. L., Gavras, A., Manzari, M. T., Zeghal, M., Abdoun, T., Korre, E., Escoffier, S., Haigh, S. K., Madabhushi, G. S. P., Madabhushi, S. S. C., Hung, W. Y., Liao, T. W., Kim, D. S., Kim, S. N., Ha, J. G., Kim, N. R., ... Liu, K. (2019). LEAP-UCD-2017 comparison of centrifuge test results. In Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading: LEAP-UCD-2017 (pp. 69-103). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_4

Kutter, BL, Carey, TJ, Stone, N, Zheng, BL, Gavras, A, Manzari, MT, Zeghal, M, Abdoun, T, Korre, E, Escoffier, S, Haigh, SK, Madabhushi, GSP, Madabhushi, SSC, Hung, WY, Liao, TW, Kim, DS, Kim, SN, Ha, JG, Kim, NR, Okamura, M, Sjafruddin, AN, Tobita, T, Ueda, K, Vargas, R, Zhou, YG & Liu, K 2019, LEAP-UCD-2017 comparison of centrifuge test results. in Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading: LEAP-UCD-2017. Springer International Publishing, pp. 69-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_4

@inbook{8892c355d4ab4f2e9cc1027abdf35008,

title = "LEAP-UCD-2017 comparison of centrifuge test results",

abstract = "This paper compares experimental results from every facility for LEAP-UCD-2017. The specified experiment consisted of a submerged medium-dense clean sand with a 5-degree slope subjected to 1 Hz ramped sine wave base motion in a rigid container. The ground motions and soil density were intentionally varied from experiment to experiment in hopes of defining the slope of the relational trend between response (e.g., displacement, pore pressure), intensity of shaking, and density or relative density. This paper is also intended to serve as a useful starting point for overview of the experimental results and to help others find specific experiments if they want to select a subset for further analysis. The results of the experiments show significant differences between each other, but the responses show a significant correlation, R2 ~ 0.7-0.8, to the known variation of the input parameters.",

keywords = "Centrifuge model test, Lateral spreading, LEAP, Liquefaction, Reproducibility, Round robin test, Validation",

author = "Kutter, {Bruce L.} and Carey, {Trevor J.} and Nicholas Stone and Zheng, {Bao Li} and Andreas Gavras and Manzari, {Majid T.} and Mourad Zeghal and Tarek Abdoun and Evangelia Korre and Sandra Escoffier and Haigh, {Stuart K.} and Madabhushi, {Gopal S.P.} and Madabhushi, {Srikanth S.C.} and Hung, {Wen Yi} and Liao, {Ting Wei} and Kim, {Dong Soo} and Kim, {Seong Nam} and Ha, {Jeong Gon} and Kim, {Nam Ryong} and Mitsu Okamura and Sjafruddin, {Asri Nurani} and Tetsuo Tobita and Kyohei Ueda and Ruben Vargas and Zhou, {Yan Guo} and Kai Liu",

year = "2019",

month = nov,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_4",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9783030228170",

pages = "69--103",

booktitle = "Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading",

publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - LEAP-UCD-2017 comparison of centrifuge test results

AU - Kutter, Bruce L.

AU - Carey, Trevor J.

AU - Stone, Nicholas

AU - Zheng, Bao Li

AU - Gavras, Andreas

AU - Manzari, Majid T.

AU - Zeghal, Mourad

AU - Abdoun, Tarek

AU - Korre, Evangelia

AU - Escoffier, Sandra

AU - Haigh, Stuart K.

AU - Madabhushi, Gopal S.P.

AU - Madabhushi, Srikanth S.C.

AU - Hung, Wen Yi

AU - Liao, Ting Wei

AU - Kim, Dong Soo

AU - Kim, Seong Nam

AU - Ha, Jeong Gon

AU - Kim, Nam Ryong

AU - Okamura, Mitsu

AU - Sjafruddin, Asri Nurani

AU - Tobita, Tetsuo

AU - Ueda, Kyohei

AU - Vargas, Ruben

AU - Zhou, Yan Guo

AU - Liu, Kai

PY - 2019/11/15

Y1 - 2019/11/15

N2 - This paper compares experimental results from every facility for LEAP-UCD-2017. The specified experiment consisted of a submerged medium-dense clean sand with a 5-degree slope subjected to 1 Hz ramped sine wave base motion in a rigid container. The ground motions and soil density were intentionally varied from experiment to experiment in hopes of defining the slope of the relational trend between response (e.g., displacement, pore pressure), intensity of shaking, and density or relative density. This paper is also intended to serve as a useful starting point for overview of the experimental results and to help others find specific experiments if they want to select a subset for further analysis. The results of the experiments show significant differences between each other, but the responses show a significant correlation, R2 ~ 0.7-0.8, to the known variation of the input parameters.

AB - This paper compares experimental results from every facility for LEAP-UCD-2017. The specified experiment consisted of a submerged medium-dense clean sand with a 5-degree slope subjected to 1 Hz ramped sine wave base motion in a rigid container. The ground motions and soil density were intentionally varied from experiment to experiment in hopes of defining the slope of the relational trend between response (e.g., displacement, pore pressure), intensity of shaking, and density or relative density. This paper is also intended to serve as a useful starting point for overview of the experimental results and to help others find specific experiments if they want to select a subset for further analysis. The results of the experiments show significant differences between each other, but the responses show a significant correlation, R2 ~ 0.7-0.8, to the known variation of the input parameters.

KW - Centrifuge model test

KW - Lateral spreading

KW - LEAP

KW - Liquefaction

KW - Reproducibility

KW - Round robin test

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193045580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193045580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_4

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-22818-7_4

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85193045580

SN - 9783030228170

SP - 69

EP - 103

BT - Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -

LEAP-UCD-2017 comparison of centrifuge test results

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this