TY - JOUR
T1 - Liberal and Conservative Representations of the Good Society
T2 - A (Social) Structural Topic Modeling Approach
AU - Sterling, Joanna
AU - Jost, John T.
AU - Hardin, Curtis D.
N1 - Funding Information:
John T. Jost is professor of Psychology and Politics and co-director of the Center for Social and Political Behavior at New York University. He received his PhD from Yale University. His research, which has been funded by the National Science Foundation, addresses social stereotyping, prejudice, political ideology, and system justification theory.
Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the INSPIRE program of the National Science Foundation (Awards SES-1248077 and SES-1248077-001) as well as the Global Institute for Advanced Study (GIAS) and Social Media and Political Participation (SMaPP) Laboratory at New York University (NYU). This work was presented by the second and third authors on the campus of NYU-Shanghai.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - What, in the 21st century, is our vision of the “good society,” and what are the obstacles to its realization? What is the ideal mix of equality and tradition, individual initiative and social welfare, economic prosperity and environmental responsibility, national unity and respect for diversity? Research suggests that liberals and conservatives differ considerably in the prioritization of these values, but nearly all of this research makes use of closed-ended responses to questionnaire items. To examine ideological similarities and dissimilarities in value expression and social representation when it comes to relatively open-ended communication in online social media networks, we used quantitative text-analytic methods to analyze more than 3.8 million messages sent by over 1 million Twitter users about what constitutes a good (vs. bad) society. Results revealed a fairly high degree of ideological divergence: Liberals were more likely to raise themes of social justice, global inequality, women’s rights, racism, criminal justice, health care, poverty, progress, social change, personal growth, and environmental sustainability, whereas conservatives were more likely to mention religion, social order, business, capitalism, national symbols, immigration, and terrorism, as well as individual authorities and news organizations. There were also some areas of convergence: Liberals, moderates, and conservatives were equally likely to prioritize economic prosperity, family, community, and the pursuit of health, happiness, and freedom.
AB - What, in the 21st century, is our vision of the “good society,” and what are the obstacles to its realization? What is the ideal mix of equality and tradition, individual initiative and social welfare, economic prosperity and environmental responsibility, national unity and respect for diversity? Research suggests that liberals and conservatives differ considerably in the prioritization of these values, but nearly all of this research makes use of closed-ended responses to questionnaire items. To examine ideological similarities and dissimilarities in value expression and social representation when it comes to relatively open-ended communication in online social media networks, we used quantitative text-analytic methods to analyze more than 3.8 million messages sent by over 1 million Twitter users about what constitutes a good (vs. bad) society. Results revealed a fairly high degree of ideological divergence: Liberals were more likely to raise themes of social justice, global inequality, women’s rights, racism, criminal justice, health care, poverty, progress, social change, personal growth, and environmental sustainability, whereas conservatives were more likely to mention religion, social order, business, capitalism, national symbols, immigration, and terrorism, as well as individual authorities and news organizations. There were also some areas of convergence: Liberals, moderates, and conservatives were equally likely to prioritize economic prosperity, family, community, and the pursuit of health, happiness, and freedom.
KW - communication
KW - mass communication
KW - media and society
KW - political communication
KW - political ideology
KW - political polarization
KW - social cognition
KW - social sciences
KW - values
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065244446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065244446&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2158244019846211
DO - 10.1177/2158244019846211
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065244446
SN - 2158-2440
VL - 9
JO - SAGE Open
JF - SAGE Open
IS - 2
ER -