TY - JOUR
T1 - Life-cycle cost analysis
T2 - State of the practice versus state of the art
AU - Ozbay, Kaan
AU - Jawad, Dima
AU - Parker, Neville A.
AU - Hussain, Sajjad
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is increasingly gaining recognition by the transportation community as an indispensable practice if the sustainability of its infrastructure systems is to be realized. The product of a 3-year study that assessed the LCCA practice in state highway agencies (SHAs) is presented. The study examined how LCCA practice changed in two decades, surveyed the way LCCA is practiced currently at SHAs in the United States, and reviewed how this evaluation technique is deliberated by the academics and researchers in the engineering and economics domains. Results of this study prove noteworthy in the inspection of an observed gap between the state of the practice and state of the art of LCCA. After all, that gap set up grounds for the noted mistrust in the credibility of LCCA. In addition to study results, an analysis of the observed gap and its causes is presented as well as recommendations for what can be done to bridge that gap. It is hoped that this will prove valuable for practitioners conducting LCCA, for policy makers, and for researchers carrying out studies on various topics related to LCCA.
AB - Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is increasingly gaining recognition by the transportation community as an indispensable practice if the sustainability of its infrastructure systems is to be realized. The product of a 3-year study that assessed the LCCA practice in state highway agencies (SHAs) is presented. The study examined how LCCA practice changed in two decades, surveyed the way LCCA is practiced currently at SHAs in the United States, and reviewed how this evaluation technique is deliberated by the academics and researchers in the engineering and economics domains. Results of this study prove noteworthy in the inspection of an observed gap between the state of the practice and state of the art of LCCA. After all, that gap set up grounds for the noted mistrust in the credibility of LCCA. In addition to study results, an analysis of the observed gap and its causes is presented as well as recommendations for what can be done to bridge that gap. It is hoped that this will prove valuable for practitioners conducting LCCA, for policy makers, and for researchers carrying out studies on various topics related to LCCA.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10044272266&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10044272266&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3141/1864-09
DO - 10.3141/1864-09
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:10044272266
SN - 0361-1981
SP - 62
EP - 70
JO - Transportation Research Record
JF - Transportation Research Record
IS - 1864
ER -