TY - JOUR
T1 - Liquefaction experiment and analysis projects (LEAP)
T2 - Summary of observations from the planning phase
AU - Manzari, Majid T.
AU - Ghoraiby, Mohamed El
AU - Kutter, Bruce L.
AU - Zeghal, Mourad
AU - Abdoun, Tarek
AU - Arduino, Pedro
AU - Armstrong, Richard J.
AU - Beaty, Michael
AU - Carey, Trevor
AU - Chen, Yunmin
AU - Ghofrani, Alborz
AU - Gutierrez, David
AU - Goswami, Nithyagopal
AU - Haigh, Stuart K.
AU - Hung, Wen Yi
AU - Iai, Susumu
AU - Kokkali, Panagiota
AU - Lee, Chung Jung
AU - Madabhushi, S. P.Gopal
AU - Mejia, Lelio
AU - Sharp, Michael
AU - Tobita, Tetsuo
AU - Ueda, Kyohei
AU - Zhou, Yanguo
AU - Ziotopoulou, Katerina
N1 - Funding Information:
The planning phase of the LEAP project has been funded by the US National Science Foundation NEES research program directed by Dr. Richard Fragaszy, through the Grants CMMI-1344705 , CMMI-1344630 , and CMMI-1344619 to the George Washington University, the University of California Davis, and the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, respectively. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The work of Zhejiang University team has been funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51578501 ), the National Program for Special Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals (2013), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LR15E080001 ) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Project) (No. 2014CB047005 ). Appendix A
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - The LEAP international collaboratory is introduced and its key objectives and main accomplishments during the planning phase of the US-LEAP (LEAP-2015) are presented. The main theme of LEAP-2015 was lateral spreading of sloping liquefiable soils. A summary of the results of the laboratory element tests performed on the selected soil (Ottawa F-65) is presented. The numerical simulations submitted by several predictors at different stages of the project are compared with the measured responses of sloping deposit specimens tested in a rigid box at six different centrifuge facilities around the world. The comparisons are presented for three rounds of simulations labeled here as types A, B, and C simulations. The type A simulations involved the response of the soil specimen to a prescribed base excitation with a maximum amplitude of 0.15g (Motion #2). Comparisons of the numerical simulations with the experimental results show that a sub-set of type A simulations were in reasonably good agreement with the responses measured in the reference centrifuge experiment. The predictors subsequently assessed the performance of their type A simulations by comparing them to the measured responses, made the necessary adjustments in their models, and conducted a type B simulation of the response of the same soil specimen subjected to an amplified base excitation with a maximum amplitude of 0.25g (Motion #4). In these type B simulations, the achieved base motions were used and the simulations showed an improved correlation with the experimental results. The predictors also conducted a type C simulation of the original test (Motion #2) using the base motions achieved on the six centrifuge facilities. The results showed very good agreement with the experimental results.
AB - The LEAP international collaboratory is introduced and its key objectives and main accomplishments during the planning phase of the US-LEAP (LEAP-2015) are presented. The main theme of LEAP-2015 was lateral spreading of sloping liquefiable soils. A summary of the results of the laboratory element tests performed on the selected soil (Ottawa F-65) is presented. The numerical simulations submitted by several predictors at different stages of the project are compared with the measured responses of sloping deposit specimens tested in a rigid box at six different centrifuge facilities around the world. The comparisons are presented for three rounds of simulations labeled here as types A, B, and C simulations. The type A simulations involved the response of the soil specimen to a prescribed base excitation with a maximum amplitude of 0.15g (Motion #2). Comparisons of the numerical simulations with the experimental results show that a sub-set of type A simulations were in reasonably good agreement with the responses measured in the reference centrifuge experiment. The predictors subsequently assessed the performance of their type A simulations by comparing them to the measured responses, made the necessary adjustments in their models, and conducted a type B simulation of the response of the same soil specimen subjected to an amplified base excitation with a maximum amplitude of 0.25g (Motion #4). In these type B simulations, the achieved base motions were used and the simulations showed an improved correlation with the experimental results. The predictors also conducted a type C simulation of the original test (Motion #2) using the base motions achieved on the six centrifuge facilities. The results showed very good agreement with the experimental results.
KW - Calibration
KW - Centrifuge modeling
KW - Constitutive modeling
KW - Elastoplasticity
KW - Liquefaction
KW - Numerical modeling
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021998812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021998812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.015
DO - 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.015
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85021998812
SN - 0267-7261
VL - 113
SP - 714
EP - 743
JO - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
JF - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
ER -