TY - JOUR
T1 - Longitudinal e-Cigarette and cigarette use among US Youth in the PATH Study (2013-2015)
AU - Stanton, Cassandra A.
AU - Bansal-Travers, Maansi
AU - Johnson, Amanda L.
AU - Sharma, Eva
AU - Katz, Lauren
AU - Ambrose, Bridget K.
AU - Silveira, Marushka L.
AU - Day, Hannah
AU - Sargent, James
AU - Borek, Nicolette
AU - Compton, Wilson M.
AU - Johnson, Sarah E.
AU - Kimmel, Heather L.
AU - Kaufman, Annette R.
AU - Limpert, Jean
AU - Abrams, David
AU - Cummings, K. Michael
AU - Goniewicz, Maciej L.
AU - Tanski, Susanne
AU - Travers, Mark J.
AU - Hyland, Andrew J.
AU - Pearson, Jennifer L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author, 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected].
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Background: Evidence is accumulating that youth who try Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS, e-cigarettes) may go on to try cigarettes. This analysis examines the bidirectional patterns of ENDS and cigarette use among US youth over one year and uses propensity score matching (PSM) to examine frequency of ENDS use on changes in cigarette smoking. Methods: Our analysis included 11 996 participants who had two waves of available data (Wave 1 [W1] 2013-2014; Wave 2 [W2] 2014-2015) drawn from the longitudinal Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Cross-sectional weighted prevalence estimates are reported for cigarettes and ENDS. We used PSM to estimate the likelihood of ENDS use at W1 and to draw matched analytic samples, then used regression (logistic or linear) models to examine the effect of W1 ENDS use on W2 cigarette smoking. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: In weighted analyses, 69.3% of W1 past-30-day cigarette smokers exhibited past-30-day smoking at W2; 42.2% of W1 past-30-day ENDS users were using ENDS at W2. W1 ever use of either product was similarly associated with W2 new use of the other product. Unweighted PSM models indicated W1 cigarette-naïve ENDS use was associated with W2 ever-cigarette smoking (n = 676; adjusted odds ratio = 3.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.95 to 5.45, P <. 001); W1 ever-ENDS use did not affect change in cigarette frequency at W2 (n = 1020, beta = 0.31, 95% CI = -0.76 to 1.39, P =. 57); 1-5 days ENDS use compared with ever, no past-30-day ENDS use was associated with a statistically significant decrease of W2 smoking days (n = 256, beta = -2.64, 95% CI = -4.96 to -0.32; P =. 03); and W1 6+ day ENDS users did not show a decrease in frequency of cigarette smoking. Conclusions: Ever-ENDS use predicts future cigarette smoking, and frequency of ENDS use has a differential impact on subsequent cigarette smoking uptake or reduction. These results suggest that both cigarettes and ENDS should be targeted in early tobacco prevention efforts with youth.
AB - Background: Evidence is accumulating that youth who try Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS, e-cigarettes) may go on to try cigarettes. This analysis examines the bidirectional patterns of ENDS and cigarette use among US youth over one year and uses propensity score matching (PSM) to examine frequency of ENDS use on changes in cigarette smoking. Methods: Our analysis included 11 996 participants who had two waves of available data (Wave 1 [W1] 2013-2014; Wave 2 [W2] 2014-2015) drawn from the longitudinal Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Cross-sectional weighted prevalence estimates are reported for cigarettes and ENDS. We used PSM to estimate the likelihood of ENDS use at W1 and to draw matched analytic samples, then used regression (logistic or linear) models to examine the effect of W1 ENDS use on W2 cigarette smoking. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: In weighted analyses, 69.3% of W1 past-30-day cigarette smokers exhibited past-30-day smoking at W2; 42.2% of W1 past-30-day ENDS users were using ENDS at W2. W1 ever use of either product was similarly associated with W2 new use of the other product. Unweighted PSM models indicated W1 cigarette-naïve ENDS use was associated with W2 ever-cigarette smoking (n = 676; adjusted odds ratio = 3.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.95 to 5.45, P <. 001); W1 ever-ENDS use did not affect change in cigarette frequency at W2 (n = 1020, beta = 0.31, 95% CI = -0.76 to 1.39, P =. 57); 1-5 days ENDS use compared with ever, no past-30-day ENDS use was associated with a statistically significant decrease of W2 smoking days (n = 256, beta = -2.64, 95% CI = -4.96 to -0.32; P =. 03); and W1 6+ day ENDS users did not show a decrease in frequency of cigarette smoking. Conclusions: Ever-ENDS use predicts future cigarette smoking, and frequency of ENDS use has a differential impact on subsequent cigarette smoking uptake or reduction. These results suggest that both cigarettes and ENDS should be targeted in early tobacco prevention efforts with youth.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Child
KW - Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
KW - Female
KW - History, 21st Century
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Prevalence
KW - Propensity Score
KW - Public Health Surveillance
KW - Smoking/epidemiology
KW - Tobacco Products
KW - United States/epidemiology
KW - Young Adult
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071487565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071487565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djz006
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djz006
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30689915
AN - SCOPUS:85071487565
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 111
SP - 1088
EP - 1096
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 10
ER -