Mandating front-of-package food labels in the U.S. – What are the First Amendment obstacles?

Jennifer Pomeranz, Parke Wilde, Dariush Mozaffarian, Renata Micha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Front-of-package (FOP) food labels are symbols, schemes, or systems designed to communicate concise and useful nutrition-related information to consumers to facilitate healthier food choices. FOP label policies have been implemented internationally that could serve as policy models for the U.S. However, the First Amendment poses a potential obstacle to U.S. government-mandated FOP requirements. We systematically reviewed existing international and major U.S.-based nutrition-related FOP labels to consider potential U.S. policy options and conducted legal research to evaluate the feasibility of mandating a FOP label in the U.S. We identified 24 international and 6 U.S.-based FOP labeling schemes. FOP labels which only disclosed nutrient-specific data would likely meet First Amendment requirements. Certain interpretive FOP labels which provide factual information with colors or designs to assist consumers interpret the information could similarly withstand First Amendment scrutiny, but questions remain regarding whether certain colors or shapes would qualify as controversial and not constitutional. Labels that provide no nutrient information and only an image or icon to characterize the entire product would not likely withstand First Amendment scrutiny.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101722
JournalFood Policy
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

food labeling
amendment
food
Food
consumer information
nutrition
Color
color
nutrients
food choices
symbol
Amendments
Food labels
nutrient
Research

Keywords

  • First Amendment
  • Food labels
  • Front-of-pack

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Mandating front-of-package food labels in the U.S. – What are the First Amendment obstacles? / Pomeranz, Jennifer; Wilde, Parke; Mozaffarian, Dariush; Micha, Renata.

In: Food Policy, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3d2b644032804f239c727fe1d30875a5,
title = "Mandating front-of-package food labels in the U.S. – What are the First Amendment obstacles?",
abstract = "Front-of-package (FOP) food labels are symbols, schemes, or systems designed to communicate concise and useful nutrition-related information to consumers to facilitate healthier food choices. FOP label policies have been implemented internationally that could serve as policy models for the U.S. However, the First Amendment poses a potential obstacle to U.S. government-mandated FOP requirements. We systematically reviewed existing international and major U.S.-based nutrition-related FOP labels to consider potential U.S. policy options and conducted legal research to evaluate the feasibility of mandating a FOP label in the U.S. We identified 24 international and 6 U.S.-based FOP labeling schemes. FOP labels which only disclosed nutrient-specific data would likely meet First Amendment requirements. Certain interpretive FOP labels which provide factual information with colors or designs to assist consumers interpret the information could similarly withstand First Amendment scrutiny, but questions remain regarding whether certain colors or shapes would qualify as controversial and not constitutional. Labels that provide no nutrient information and only an image or icon to characterize the entire product would not likely withstand First Amendment scrutiny.",
keywords = "First Amendment, Food labels, Front-of-pack",
author = "Jennifer Pomeranz and Parke Wilde and Dariush Mozaffarian and Renata Micha",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Food Policy",
issn = "0306-9192",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mandating front-of-package food labels in the U.S. – What are the First Amendment obstacles?

AU - Pomeranz, Jennifer

AU - Wilde, Parke

AU - Mozaffarian, Dariush

AU - Micha, Renata

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Front-of-package (FOP) food labels are symbols, schemes, or systems designed to communicate concise and useful nutrition-related information to consumers to facilitate healthier food choices. FOP label policies have been implemented internationally that could serve as policy models for the U.S. However, the First Amendment poses a potential obstacle to U.S. government-mandated FOP requirements. We systematically reviewed existing international and major U.S.-based nutrition-related FOP labels to consider potential U.S. policy options and conducted legal research to evaluate the feasibility of mandating a FOP label in the U.S. We identified 24 international and 6 U.S.-based FOP labeling schemes. FOP labels which only disclosed nutrient-specific data would likely meet First Amendment requirements. Certain interpretive FOP labels which provide factual information with colors or designs to assist consumers interpret the information could similarly withstand First Amendment scrutiny, but questions remain regarding whether certain colors or shapes would qualify as controversial and not constitutional. Labels that provide no nutrient information and only an image or icon to characterize the entire product would not likely withstand First Amendment scrutiny.

AB - Front-of-package (FOP) food labels are symbols, schemes, or systems designed to communicate concise and useful nutrition-related information to consumers to facilitate healthier food choices. FOP label policies have been implemented internationally that could serve as policy models for the U.S. However, the First Amendment poses a potential obstacle to U.S. government-mandated FOP requirements. We systematically reviewed existing international and major U.S.-based nutrition-related FOP labels to consider potential U.S. policy options and conducted legal research to evaluate the feasibility of mandating a FOP label in the U.S. We identified 24 international and 6 U.S.-based FOP labeling schemes. FOP labels which only disclosed nutrient-specific data would likely meet First Amendment requirements. Certain interpretive FOP labels which provide factual information with colors or designs to assist consumers interpret the information could similarly withstand First Amendment scrutiny, but questions remain regarding whether certain colors or shapes would qualify as controversial and not constitutional. Labels that provide no nutrient information and only an image or icon to characterize the entire product would not likely withstand First Amendment scrutiny.

KW - First Amendment

KW - Food labels

KW - Front-of-pack

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067276220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067276220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.05.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067276220

JO - Food Policy

JF - Food Policy

SN - 0306-9192

M1 - 101722

ER -