TY - JOUR
T1 - Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey
AU - Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
AU - Mur, Marieke
AU - Ruff, Douglas A.
AU - Kiani, Roozbeh
AU - Bodurka, Jerzy
AU - Esteky, Hossein
AU - Tanaka, Keiji
AU - Bandettini, Peter A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Chris Baker, James Haxby, Alex Martin, Nancy Kanwisher, Dwight Kravitz, Leslie Ungerleider, and Vina Vo for helpful discussions. This research was supported in part by the Intramural Program of the National Institute of Mental Health.
PY - 2008/12/26
Y1 - 2008/12/26
N2 - Inferior temporal (IT) object representations have been intensively studied in monkeys and humans, but representations of the same particular objects have never been compared between the species. Moreover, IT's role in categorization is not well understood. Here, we presented monkeys and humans with the same images of real-world objects and measured the IT response pattern elicited by each image. In order to relate the representations between the species and to computational models, we compare response-pattern dissimilarity matrices. IT response patterns form category clusters, which match between man and monkey. The clusters correspond to animate and inanimate objects; within the animate objects, faces and bodies form subclusters. Within each category, IT distinguishes individual exemplars, and the within-category exemplar similarities also match between the species. Our findings suggest that primate IT across species may host a common code, which combines a categorical and a continuous representation of objects.
AB - Inferior temporal (IT) object representations have been intensively studied in monkeys and humans, but representations of the same particular objects have never been compared between the species. Moreover, IT's role in categorization is not well understood. Here, we presented monkeys and humans with the same images of real-world objects and measured the IT response pattern elicited by each image. In order to relate the representations between the species and to computational models, we compare response-pattern dissimilarity matrices. IT response patterns form category clusters, which match between man and monkey. The clusters correspond to animate and inanimate objects; within the animate objects, faces and bodies form subclusters. Within each category, IT distinguishes individual exemplars, and the within-category exemplar similarities also match between the species. Our findings suggest that primate IT across species may host a common code, which combines a categorical and a continuous representation of objects.
KW - SYSNEURO
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57649196582&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57649196582&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.043
DO - 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.043
M3 - Article
C2 - 19109916
AN - SCOPUS:57649196582
SN - 0896-6273
VL - 60
SP - 1126
EP - 1141
JO - Neuron
JF - Neuron
IS - 6
ER -