Mechanical evaluation of four narrow-diameter implant systems

Ronaldo Hirata, Estevam A. Bonfante, Lucas S. Machado, Nick Tovar, Paulo G. Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the survival probability of four narrow-diameter implant systems when subjected to fatigue loading. Materials and Methods: Seventytwo narrow-diameter implants to be restored with single-unit crowns were divided into four groups (n = 18): Astra Tech (3.5-mm diameter), with a standard connection (ASC); BioHorizon (3.4-mm diameter), with a standard connection (BSC); Intra-Lock (3.4-mm diameter), with a standard multilobular connection (ISC); and Intra-Lock (3.4-diameter), with a modified square connection (IMC). The corresponding abutments were screwed onto the implants, and standardized metal crowns (maxillary central incisors) were cemented and subjected to step-stress accelerated life testing in water. Use-level probability Weibull curves and reliability for 100,000 cycles at 150 and 200 N (90% two-sided confidence intervals) were calculated. Polarized light and scanning electron microscopes were used to access the failure modes. Results: The calculated survival probability for 100,000 cycles at 150 N was approximately 93% in group ASC, 98% in group BSC, 94% in group ISC, and 99% in group IMC. At 200 N, the survival rate was estimated to be approximately < 0.1% for ASC, 77% for BSC, 34% for ISC, and 93% for IMC. Abutment screw fracture was the main failure mode for all groups. Conclusions: Although the probability of survival was not significantly different among systems at a load of 150 N, a significant decrease was observed at 200 N for all groups except IMC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-362
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Prosthodontics
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanical evaluation of four narrow-diameter implant systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this