TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanisms of child behavior change in parent training
T2 - Comment on Weeland et al. (2018)
AU - Beauchaine, Theodore P.
AU - Slep, Amy
N1 - Funding Information:
Beauchaine Theodore P. a Slep Amy b a Ohio State University b New York University Work on this comment was supported by Grant DE025980 from the National Institutes of Health, and by the National Institutes of Health Science of Behavior Change (SoBC) Common Fund. Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Theodore P. Beauchaine, Department of Psychology , Ohio State University , 1835 Neil Avenue , Columbus, OH 43210 ; E-mail: beauchaine.1@osu.edu . 04 09 2018 10 2018 30 4 1529 1534 Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 2018 Cambridge University Press
Publisher Copyright:
© Cambridge University Press 2018Â.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Recently in this journal, Weeland et al. (2018) published a thought-provoking article reporting moderating effects of children's serotonin transporter-linked polymorphisms (5-HTTLPR) on negative parenting during prevention with the Incredible Years series. Participants were parents and young children of 387 families enrolled in the Observational Randomized Control Trial of Childhood Differential Susceptibility study. An equally important finding, which we focus on in this comment, involved null effects for all tests of parenting as a mediator of prevention-induced improvements in children's externalizing behavior. Although such findings may seem surprising, both confirmations of and failures to confirm parenting change as a mediator of child behavior change are common in the prevention and intervention literatures. In this comment, we explore likely reasons for heterogeneity in findings, including both moderators of treatment effect size and methods used to test mediation. Common moderators of prevention and intervention response to Incredible Years include dose, parenting problems at intake, high-risk versus clinical nature of samples, how parenting is measured, and whether child training is included with parent training. All of these moderators affect power to detect mediation. We then discuss conceptual criteria for testing mediation in randomized clinical trials, and problems with interpreting mediating paths in cross-lag panel models. Although the gene effect reported by Weeland et al. is important, their cross-lag panel models do not provide strong tests of parenting as a mediator of child behavior change. We conclude with recommendations for testing mediation in randomized clinical trials.
AB - Recently in this journal, Weeland et al. (2018) published a thought-provoking article reporting moderating effects of children's serotonin transporter-linked polymorphisms (5-HTTLPR) on negative parenting during prevention with the Incredible Years series. Participants were parents and young children of 387 families enrolled in the Observational Randomized Control Trial of Childhood Differential Susceptibility study. An equally important finding, which we focus on in this comment, involved null effects for all tests of parenting as a mediator of prevention-induced improvements in children's externalizing behavior. Although such findings may seem surprising, both confirmations of and failures to confirm parenting change as a mediator of child behavior change are common in the prevention and intervention literatures. In this comment, we explore likely reasons for heterogeneity in findings, including both moderators of treatment effect size and methods used to test mediation. Common moderators of prevention and intervention response to Incredible Years include dose, parenting problems at intake, high-risk versus clinical nature of samples, how parenting is measured, and whether child training is included with parent training. All of these moderators affect power to detect mediation. We then discuss conceptual criteria for testing mediation in randomized clinical trials, and problems with interpreting mediating paths in cross-lag panel models. Although the gene effect reported by Weeland et al. is important, their cross-lag panel models do not provide strong tests of parenting as a mediator of child behavior change. We conclude with recommendations for testing mediation in randomized clinical trials.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052829969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052829969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0954579418000810
DO - 10.1017/S0954579418000810
M3 - Article
C2 - 30179149
AN - SCOPUS:85052829969
SN - 0954-5794
VL - 30
SP - 1529
EP - 1534
JO - Development and Psychopathology
JF - Development and Psychopathology
IS - 4
ER -