Mechanisms of memory stabilization: Are consolidation and reconsolidation similar or distinct processes?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Consolidation of new memories depends on a crucial phase of protein synthesis. It is widely held that, once consolidated, memories are stable and resilient to disruption. However, established memories become labile when recalled and require another phase of protein synthesis to be maintained. Therefore, it has been proposed that when a memory is reactivated it must undergo additional consolidation (reconsolidation) to persist. To determine whether reconsolidation recapitulates consolidation, in the past few years several groups have investigated whether the same molecules and pathways mediate the formation of a memory and its maintenance after reactivation. At first glance, the results appear conflicting: although both processes appear to engage the same molecules and mechanisms, brain areas involved in consolidation after initial training are not required for reconsolidation. In addition, the formation of a memory and its maintenance after reactivation seem to have distinctive temporal molecular requirements. This review concludes with a working model that could explain the apparent controversy of memory vulnerability after reactivation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-56
Number of pages6
JournalTrends in Neurosciences
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanisms of memory stabilization: Are consolidation and reconsolidation similar or distinct processes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this