Abstract
Mentally contrasting a desired future with present reality standing in its way promotes commitment to feasible goals, whereas mentally indulging in a desired future does not. Dieting students (N = 134) reported their most important dieting wish that they deemed attainable within a 2-week period. Then, they were directed to mentally contrast or indulge in thoughts and images about the named dieting wish. A control condition was given no directions. Two weeks after the experiment, dieters retrospectively rated their behaviour change: in the mental contrasting condition they reported having eaten relatively fewer calories overall, fewer high-calorie food and more low-calorie food compared to those in the indulging and control conditions, and they also reported having been more physically active. This transfer effect from one health domain to another suggests a more generalised effect of mental contrasting versus indulging and control than previously assumed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 43-58 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Psychology and Health |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | SUPPL. 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2012 |
Keywords
- dieting
- goal commitment
- indulging
- mental contrasting
- physical exercise
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health