TY - JOUR
T1 - Mental illness and bipolar disorder on Twitter
T2 - implications for stigma and social support
AU - Budenz, Alexandra
AU - Klassen, Ann
AU - Purtle, Jonathan
AU - Yom Tov, Elad
AU - Yudell, Michael
AU - Massey, Philip
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/3/3
Y1 - 2020/3/3
N2 - Background: Mental illness (MI), and particularly, bipolar disorder (BD), are highly stigmatized. However, it is unknown if this stigma is also represented on social media. Aims: Characterize Twitter-based stigma and social support messaging (“tweets”) about mental health/illness (MH)/MI and BD and determine which tweets garnered retweets. Methods: We collected tweets about MH/MI and BD during a three-month period and analyzed tweets from dates with the most tweets (“spikes”), an indicator of topic interest. A sample was manually content analyzed, and the remainder were classified using machine learning (logistic regression) by topic, stigma, and social support messaging. We compared stigma and support toward MH/MI versus BD and used logistic regression to quantify tweet features associated with retweets, to assess tweet reach. Results: Of the 1,270,902 tweets analyzed, 94.7% discussed MH/MI and 5.3% discussed BD. Spikes coincided with a celebrity’s death and a MH awareness campaign. Although the sample contained more support than stigma messaging, BD tweets contained more stigma and less support than MH/MI tweets. However, stigma messaging was infrequently retweeted, and users often retweeted personal MH experiences. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate opportunities for social media advocacy to reduce stigma and increase displays of social support towards people living with BD.
AB - Background: Mental illness (MI), and particularly, bipolar disorder (BD), are highly stigmatized. However, it is unknown if this stigma is also represented on social media. Aims: Characterize Twitter-based stigma and social support messaging (“tweets”) about mental health/illness (MH)/MI and BD and determine which tweets garnered retweets. Methods: We collected tweets about MH/MI and BD during a three-month period and analyzed tweets from dates with the most tweets (“spikes”), an indicator of topic interest. A sample was manually content analyzed, and the remainder were classified using machine learning (logistic regression) by topic, stigma, and social support messaging. We compared stigma and support toward MH/MI versus BD and used logistic regression to quantify tweet features associated with retweets, to assess tweet reach. Results: Of the 1,270,902 tweets analyzed, 94.7% discussed MH/MI and 5.3% discussed BD. Spikes coincided with a celebrity’s death and a MH awareness campaign. Although the sample contained more support than stigma messaging, BD tweets contained more stigma and less support than MH/MI tweets. However, stigma messaging was infrequently retweeted, and users often retweeted personal MH experiences. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate opportunities for social media advocacy to reduce stigma and increase displays of social support towards people living with BD.
KW - Mental health
KW - Twitter
KW - bipolar disorder
KW - social media
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074993249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074993249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09638237.2019.1677878
DO - 10.1080/09638237.2019.1677878
M3 - Article
C2 - 31694433
AN - SCOPUS:85074993249
SN - 0963-8237
VL - 29
SP - 191
EP - 199
JO - Journal of Mental Health
JF - Journal of Mental Health
IS - 2
ER -