TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling light and temperature effects on leaf emergence in wheat and barley
AU - Volk, T.
AU - Bugbee, B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Support provided by NASA Cooperative Agreements NCC2-608 (for T. Volk) and NCC2-139 (for B. Bugbee).
Publisher Copyright:
© 1991, Crop Science Society of America. All rights reserved.
PY - 1991
Y1 - 1991
N2 - Phenological development affects canopy structure, radiation interception, and dry matter production; most crop simulation models therefore incorporate leaf emergence rate as a basic parameter. A recent study examined leaf emergence rate as a function of temperature and daylength among wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars. Leaf emergence rate and phyllochron were modeled as functions of temperature alone, daylength alone, and the interaction between temperature and daylength. The resulting equations contained an unwieldy number of constants. Here we simplify by reducing the constants by >70%, and show leaf emergence rate as a single response surface with temperature and daylength. In addition, we incorporate the effect of photosynthetic photon flux into the model. Generic fits for wheat and barley show cultivar differences less than ± 5% for wheat and less than ± 10% for barley. Barley is more sensitive to daylength changes than wheat for common environmental values of daylength, which may be related to the difference in sensitivity to daylength between spring and winter cultivars. Differences in leaf emergence rate between cultivars can be incorporated into the model by means of a single, nondimensional factor for each cultivar.
AB - Phenological development affects canopy structure, radiation interception, and dry matter production; most crop simulation models therefore incorporate leaf emergence rate as a basic parameter. A recent study examined leaf emergence rate as a function of temperature and daylength among wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars. Leaf emergence rate and phyllochron were modeled as functions of temperature alone, daylength alone, and the interaction between temperature and daylength. The resulting equations contained an unwieldy number of constants. Here we simplify by reducing the constants by >70%, and show leaf emergence rate as a single response surface with temperature and daylength. In addition, we incorporate the effect of photosynthetic photon flux into the model. Generic fits for wheat and barley show cultivar differences less than ± 5% for wheat and less than ± 10% for barley. Barley is more sensitive to daylength changes than wheat for common environmental values of daylength, which may be related to the difference in sensitivity to daylength between spring and winter cultivars. Differences in leaf emergence rate between cultivars can be incorporated into the model by means of a single, nondimensional factor for each cultivar.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026230971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026230971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100050028x
DO - 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100050028x
M3 - Article
C2 - 11537630
AN - SCOPUS:0026230971
SN - 0011-183X
VL - 31
SP - 1218
EP - 1224
JO - Crop Science
JF - Crop Science
IS - 5
ER -