MSCs in positional neutralisation: The problem of gapped inventories

Maria Gouskova

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Do inputs need to be restricted on a language-specific basis? Classic Optimality Theory claims that they do not: the rich base is filtered by constraints that yield full contrast, complementary distributions or positional neutralisation depending on the ranking. The problem arises when positional neutralisation affects a gappy contrast. In Russian, voicing neutralisation works on all obstruents alike, including non-contrastively voiceless ones - but it creates voiced allophones that are otherwise disallowed. In the popular OT account of positional neutralisation, analysing these cases requires handling voicing twice: once for all segments, then again for gaps. I argue that the solution is to relax the rich base assumption by ruling gaps out at the UR level through morpheme structure constraints (Halle 1959 et seq.).

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)229-265
    Number of pages37
    JournalPhonology
    Volume40
    Issue number3-4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 1 2023

    Keywords

    • inventory gaps
    • morpheme structure constraints
    • Optimality Theory
    • positional faithfulness
    • voicing assimilation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Language and Linguistics
    • Linguistics and Language

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'MSCs in positional neutralisation: The problem of gapped inventories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this