My country, right or wrong: Does activating system justification motivation eliminate the liberal-conservative gap in patriotism?

Jojanneke Van der Toorn, Paul R. Nail, Ido Liviatan, John T. Jost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ideological differences in nationalism and patriotism are well-known and frequently exploited, but the question of why conservatives exhibit stronger national attachment than liberals has been inadequately addressed. Drawing on theories of system justification and political ideology as motivated social cognition, we proposed that increased patriotism is one means of satisfying the system justification goal. Thus, we hypothesized that temporarily activating system justification motivation should raise national attachment among liberals to the level of conservatives. Three experiments conducted in New York, Arkansas, and Wisconsin support this hypothesis. In the first two experiments, liberals exhibited weaker national attachment than conservatives in the absence of system justification activation, consistent with prior research. However, exposure to system criticism (Experiment 1) and system-level injustice (Experiment 2) caused liberals to strengthen their national attachment, eliminating the ideological gap. Using a system dependence manipulation in Experiment 3, this pattern was conceptually replicated with respect to patriotic but not nationalistic attachment, as hypothesized. Thus, chronic and temporary variability in system justification motivation helps to explain when liberals and conservatives do (and do not) differ in terms of national attachment and why.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages50-60
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume54
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

patriotism
Motivation
Political Systems
Cognition
experiment
system criticism
Research
political ideology
social cognition
activation
manipulation
nationalism

Keywords

  • Motivation
  • Nationalism
  • Patriotism
  • Political ideology
  • System justification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

My country, right or wrong : Does activating system justification motivation eliminate the liberal-conservative gap in patriotism? / Van der Toorn, Jojanneke; Nail, Paul R.; Liviatan, Ido; Jost, John T.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 54, 2014, p. 50-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f0b863b2c6334178a3ff4d525424d0af,
title = "My country, right or wrong: Does activating system justification motivation eliminate the liberal-conservative gap in patriotism?",
abstract = "Ideological differences in nationalism and patriotism are well-known and frequently exploited, but the question of why conservatives exhibit stronger national attachment than liberals has been inadequately addressed. Drawing on theories of system justification and political ideology as motivated social cognition, we proposed that increased patriotism is one means of satisfying the system justification goal. Thus, we hypothesized that temporarily activating system justification motivation should raise national attachment among liberals to the level of conservatives. Three experiments conducted in New York, Arkansas, and Wisconsin support this hypothesis. In the first two experiments, liberals exhibited weaker national attachment than conservatives in the absence of system justification activation, consistent with prior research. However, exposure to system criticism (Experiment 1) and system-level injustice (Experiment 2) caused liberals to strengthen their national attachment, eliminating the ideological gap. Using a system dependence manipulation in Experiment 3, this pattern was conceptually replicated with respect to patriotic but not nationalistic attachment, as hypothesized. Thus, chronic and temporary variability in system justification motivation helps to explain when liberals and conservatives do (and do not) differ in terms of national attachment and why.",
keywords = "Motivation, Nationalism, Patriotism, Political ideology, System justification",
author = "{Van der Toorn}, Jojanneke and Nail, {Paul R.} and Ido Liviatan and Jost, {John T.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "50--60",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - My country, right or wrong

T2 - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

AU - Van der Toorn, Jojanneke

AU - Nail, Paul R.

AU - Liviatan, Ido

AU - Jost, John T.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Ideological differences in nationalism and patriotism are well-known and frequently exploited, but the question of why conservatives exhibit stronger national attachment than liberals has been inadequately addressed. Drawing on theories of system justification and political ideology as motivated social cognition, we proposed that increased patriotism is one means of satisfying the system justification goal. Thus, we hypothesized that temporarily activating system justification motivation should raise national attachment among liberals to the level of conservatives. Three experiments conducted in New York, Arkansas, and Wisconsin support this hypothesis. In the first two experiments, liberals exhibited weaker national attachment than conservatives in the absence of system justification activation, consistent with prior research. However, exposure to system criticism (Experiment 1) and system-level injustice (Experiment 2) caused liberals to strengthen their national attachment, eliminating the ideological gap. Using a system dependence manipulation in Experiment 3, this pattern was conceptually replicated with respect to patriotic but not nationalistic attachment, as hypothesized. Thus, chronic and temporary variability in system justification motivation helps to explain when liberals and conservatives do (and do not) differ in terms of national attachment and why.

AB - Ideological differences in nationalism and patriotism are well-known and frequently exploited, but the question of why conservatives exhibit stronger national attachment than liberals has been inadequately addressed. Drawing on theories of system justification and political ideology as motivated social cognition, we proposed that increased patriotism is one means of satisfying the system justification goal. Thus, we hypothesized that temporarily activating system justification motivation should raise national attachment among liberals to the level of conservatives. Three experiments conducted in New York, Arkansas, and Wisconsin support this hypothesis. In the first two experiments, liberals exhibited weaker national attachment than conservatives in the absence of system justification activation, consistent with prior research. However, exposure to system criticism (Experiment 1) and system-level injustice (Experiment 2) caused liberals to strengthen their national attachment, eliminating the ideological gap. Using a system dependence manipulation in Experiment 3, this pattern was conceptually replicated with respect to patriotic but not nationalistic attachment, as hypothesized. Thus, chronic and temporary variability in system justification motivation helps to explain when liberals and conservatives do (and do not) differ in terms of national attachment and why.

KW - Motivation

KW - Nationalism

KW - Patriotism

KW - Political ideology

KW - System justification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899867764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899867764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.003

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 50

EP - 60

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -