TY - JOUR
T1 - National Institutes of Health diversity supplements
T2 - Perspectives from administrative insiders
AU - David, Daniel
AU - Weir, Melissa L.
AU - Enwerem, Nkechi
AU - Schulman-Green, Dena
AU - Okunji, Priscilla O.
AU - Travers, Jasmine L.
AU - Clark-Cutaia, Maya N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Background: The NIH Diversity Administrative Supplement is a funding mechanism that provides support for diverse early-stage researchers. There is limited guidance on how to apply for these awards. Purpose: We describe perspectives of NIH program/diversity officers and university research administrators offering recommendations for diversity supplement submission. Methods: This article is the product of a working group exploring diversity in research. Nursing faculty from an R2 Historically Black College and University and an R1 research intensive university conducted stakeholder interviews with NIH program/diversity officers and university research administrators. We used content analysis to categorize respondents’ recommendations. Findings: Recommendations centered on harmonizing the applicant with the program announcement, communication with program/diversity officers, mentor/mentee relationship, scientific plan, and systematic institutional approaches to the diversity supplement. Discussion: Successful strategies in submitting diversity supplements will facilitate inclusion of diverse researchers in NIH-sponsored programs. Systematic approaches are needed to support development of diverse voices to enhance the scientific community.
AB - Background: The NIH Diversity Administrative Supplement is a funding mechanism that provides support for diverse early-stage researchers. There is limited guidance on how to apply for these awards. Purpose: We describe perspectives of NIH program/diversity officers and university research administrators offering recommendations for diversity supplement submission. Methods: This article is the product of a working group exploring diversity in research. Nursing faculty from an R2 Historically Black College and University and an R1 research intensive university conducted stakeholder interviews with NIH program/diversity officers and university research administrators. We used content analysis to categorize respondents’ recommendations. Findings: Recommendations centered on harmonizing the applicant with the program announcement, communication with program/diversity officers, mentor/mentee relationship, scientific plan, and systematic institutional approaches to the diversity supplement. Discussion: Successful strategies in submitting diversity supplements will facilitate inclusion of diverse researchers in NIH-sponsored programs. Systematic approaches are needed to support development of diverse voices to enhance the scientific community.
KW - Biomedical Research
KW - Diversity Supplement
KW - Equity
KW - Grantsmanship
KW - National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
KW - Research Support as Topic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142223991&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142223991&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.08.006
DO - 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.08.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 36396502
AN - SCOPUS:85142223991
SN - 0029-6554
VL - 70
SP - 827
EP - 836
JO - Nursing outlook
JF - Nursing outlook
IS - 6
ER -