Navigating the landscape of child disability measurement: A review of available data collection instruments

Claudia Cappa, Nicole Petrowski, Janet Njelesani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities adopted in 2006 holds States responsible to "...collect appropriate information, including statistical and research data, to enable them to formulate and implement policies..." This recognition has led to an increasing number of countries gathering data on disability at the population level; however, there are currently no gold standards for its measurement and different data collection tools have been used throughout the years to fulfill data needs. Understanding how these differences have influenced the measurement of disability globally is crucial to developing reliable and comparable measures. The purpose of this paper is to describe the varying scope and content of data collection instruments on child disability and to provide a historical snapshot of the rates of reported disability among children. A total of 716 data sources were identified, corresponding to 198 countries covering more than 95% of the world's children. The findings reveal a lack of consistent definitions and measures of disability, which contribute to major challenges in producing reliable and comparable statistics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-330
Number of pages14
JournalAlter
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Keywords

  • Census
  • Child disability
  • Disability
  • International
  • Prevalence
  • Survey
  • childhood disability
  • pediatric disability
  • measures of disability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Health(social science)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Navigating the landscape of child disability measurement: A review of available data collection instruments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this