TY - JOUR
T1 - Neoliberal Ideology and the Justification of Inequality in Capitalist Societies
T2 - Why Social and Economic Dimensions of Ideology Are Intertwined
AU - Azevedo, Flavio
AU - Jost, John T.
AU - Rothmund, Tobias
AU - Sterling, Joanna
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by New York University, the Technische Universität Darmstadt in Germany, and the J. William Fulbright Program. In addition, data analyzed for Samples 3 and 4 came from YouGov surveys that were funded by awards from the National Science Foundation to the second author (Awards # SES-1248077 and SES-1248077-001). The second author thanks Ben Carrington for sending along a copy of Stuart Hall’s Selected Political Writings at just the right time. Supplemental materials, analysis, and appendices for this article are available at https://osf.io/mzt2k/.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - In this article we analyze data from high-quality surveys conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom that included multiple symbolic and operational measures of political ideology and psychological orientations. Our overarching goal is to elucidate the nature of conceptual and empirical connections between neoliberalism and social conservatism. In so doing, we revisit three major questions about public opinion in neoliberal societies: (1) Are ordinary citizens “innocent” of ideology? (2) Are social and economic dimensions of ideology structurally and functionally independent? (3) Are support for laissez-faire capitalism and opposition to welfare—hallmarks of neoliberal ideology—unrelated or negatively related to authoritarianism? In contrast to previous investigations relying upon fewer and poorer measures, we found that ordinary citizens do indeed hold coherent political attitudes, and their attitudes about social and economic issues are closely aligned. For instance, we observed that for five previously published ideological instruments, social and economic attitudes were robustly correlated in two large U.S. samples (with rs ranging from.40 to.69)—for respondents who were relatively low (.31 ≤ r ≤.60) as well as high in political sophistication (.50 ≤ r ≤.77). Contradicting prior claims, we found no evidence that support for the free market was negatively associated with authoritarianism for any group of respondents or any measure of authoritarianism. On the contrary, economic conservatism and the endorsement of neoliberal attitudes were strongly associated with right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, economic system justification, and gender-specific system justification (with rs ranging from.53 to.76). We conclude that the political belief systems of ordinary citizens are coherently organized around support for versus opposition to both social and economic forms of inequality in contemporary capitalist societies.
AB - In this article we analyze data from high-quality surveys conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom that included multiple symbolic and operational measures of political ideology and psychological orientations. Our overarching goal is to elucidate the nature of conceptual and empirical connections between neoliberalism and social conservatism. In so doing, we revisit three major questions about public opinion in neoliberal societies: (1) Are ordinary citizens “innocent” of ideology? (2) Are social and economic dimensions of ideology structurally and functionally independent? (3) Are support for laissez-faire capitalism and opposition to welfare—hallmarks of neoliberal ideology—unrelated or negatively related to authoritarianism? In contrast to previous investigations relying upon fewer and poorer measures, we found that ordinary citizens do indeed hold coherent political attitudes, and their attitudes about social and economic issues are closely aligned. For instance, we observed that for five previously published ideological instruments, social and economic attitudes were robustly correlated in two large U.S. samples (with rs ranging from.40 to.69)—for respondents who were relatively low (.31 ≤ r ≤.60) as well as high in political sophistication (.50 ≤ r ≤.77). Contradicting prior claims, we found no evidence that support for the free market was negatively associated with authoritarianism for any group of respondents or any measure of authoritarianism. On the contrary, economic conservatism and the endorsement of neoliberal attitudes were strongly associated with right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, economic system justification, and gender-specific system justification (with rs ranging from.53 to.76). We conclude that the political belief systems of ordinary citizens are coherently organized around support for versus opposition to both social and economic forms of inequality in contemporary capitalist societies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061996406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061996406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/josi.12310
DO - 10.1111/josi.12310
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061996406
SN - 0022-4537
VL - 75
SP - 49
EP - 88
JO - Journal of Social Issues
JF - Journal of Social Issues
IS - 1
ER -