Abstract
A recent opinion article (Neural oscillations in speech: do not be enslaved by the envelope. Obleser et al., 2012) questions the validity of a class of speech perception models inspired by the possible role of neuronal oscillations in decoding speech (e.g., Ghitza, 2011; Giraud and Poeppel, 2012). The authors criticize, in particular, what they see as an over-emphasis of the role of temporal speech envelope information, and an over-emphasis of entrainment to the input rhythm while neglecting the role of top-down processes in modulating the entrainment of neuronal oscillations. Here we respond to these arguments, referring to the phenomenological model of Ghitza (2011), taken as a representative of the criticized approach.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-4 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |
Issue number | JAN |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 4 2013 |
Keywords
- Cascaded neuronal oscillations
- Critical-band envelopes
- Hierarchical window structure
- Intelligibility
- Syllabic parsing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Neurology
- Biological Psychiatry