New evidence on information disclosure through restaurant hygiene grading

Daniel E. Ho, Zoe C. Ashwood, Cassandra Handan-Nader

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The case of restaurant hygiene grading occupies a central role in information disclosure scholarship. Comparing Los Angeles, which enacted grading in 1998, with California from 1995-1999, Jin and Leslie (2003) found that grading reduced foodborne illness hospitalizations by 20 percent. Expanding hospitalization data and collecting new data on mandatorily reported illnesses, we show that this finding does not hold up under improvements to the original data and methodology. The largest salmonella outbreak in state history hit Southern California before Los Angeles implemented grading. Placebo tests detect the same treatment effects for Southern California counties, none of which changed restaurant grading. (JEL D83, H75, I12, I18, L83, L88).

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)404-428
    Number of pages25
    JournalAmerican Economic Journal: Economic Policy
    Volume11
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'New evidence on information disclosure through restaurant hygiene grading'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this