TY - JOUR
T1 - Noise masking reveals channels for second-order letters
AU - Oruç, Ipek
AU - Landy, Michael S.
AU - Pelli, Denis G.
N1 - Funding Information:
The work reported here was supported by Grants EY08266 (MSL) and EY04432 (DGP) from the National Institutes of Health. We thank our anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.
PY - 2006/4
Y1 - 2006/4
N2 - We investigate the channels underlying identification of second-order letters using a critical-band masking paradigm. We find that observers use a single 1-1.5 octave-wide channel for this task. This channel's best spatial frequency (c/letter) did not change across different noise conditions (indicating the inability of observers to switch channels to improve signal-to-noise ratio) or across different letter sizes (indicating scale invariance), for a fixed carrier frequency (c/letter). However, the channel's best spatial frequency does change with stimulus carrier frequency (both in c/letter); one is proportional to the other. Following Majaj et al. (Majaj, N. J., Pelli, D. G., Kurshan, P., & Palomares, M. (2002). The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Research, 42, 1165-1184), we define "stroke frequency" as the line frequency (strokes/deg) in the luminance image. That is, for luminance-defined letters, stroke frequency is the number of lines (strokes) across each letter divided by letter width. For second-order letters, letter texture stroke frequency is the number of carrier cycles (luminance lines) within the letter ink area divided by the letter width. Unlike the nonlinear dependence found for first-order letters (implying scale-dependent processing), for second-order letters the channel frequency is half the letter texture stroke frequency (suggesting scale-invariant processing).
AB - We investigate the channels underlying identification of second-order letters using a critical-band masking paradigm. We find that observers use a single 1-1.5 octave-wide channel for this task. This channel's best spatial frequency (c/letter) did not change across different noise conditions (indicating the inability of observers to switch channels to improve signal-to-noise ratio) or across different letter sizes (indicating scale invariance), for a fixed carrier frequency (c/letter). However, the channel's best spatial frequency does change with stimulus carrier frequency (both in c/letter); one is proportional to the other. Following Majaj et al. (Majaj, N. J., Pelli, D. G., Kurshan, P., & Palomares, M. (2002). The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Research, 42, 1165-1184), we define "stroke frequency" as the line frequency (strokes/deg) in the luminance image. That is, for luminance-defined letters, stroke frequency is the number of lines (strokes) across each letter divided by letter width. For second-order letters, letter texture stroke frequency is the number of carrier cycles (luminance lines) within the letter ink area divided by the letter width. Unlike the nonlinear dependence found for first-order letters (implying scale-dependent processing), for second-order letters the channel frequency is half the letter texture stroke frequency (suggesting scale-invariant processing).
KW - Channel switching
KW - Critical-band masking
KW - Letter identification
KW - Scale invariance
KW - Second-order vision
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30444433578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30444433578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.016
DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 16203023
AN - SCOPUS:30444433578
SN - 0042-6989
VL - 46
SP - 1493
EP - 1506
JO - Vision research
JF - Vision research
IS - 8-9
ER -