TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-self similar blowup solutions to the higher dimensional Yang Mills heat flows
AU - Bensouilah, A.
AU - Duong, G. K.
AU - Ghoul, T. E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2025/5/15
Y1 - 2025/5/15
N2 - In this paper, we consider the Yang-Mills heat flow on Rd×SO(d) with d≥11. Under a certain symmetry preserved by the flow, the Yang-Mills equation can be reduced to the following nonlinear equation: ∂tu=∂r2u+[Formula presented]∂ru−3(d−2)u2−(d−2)r2u3, and (r,t)∈R+×R+. We are interested in describing the singularity formation of this parabolic equation. More precisely, we aim to construct non self-similar blowup solutions in higher dimensions d≥11, and prove that the asymptotic behavior of the solution is of the form u(r,t)∼[Formula presented]), as t→T, where Q is the steady state corresponding to the boundary conditions Q(0)=−1,Q′(0)=0 and the blowup speed λℓ satisfies λℓ(t)=(C(u0)+ot→T(1))(T−t)[Formula presented] as t→T,ℓ∈N+⁎,α>1. In particular, the case ℓ=1 corresponds to the stable type II blowup regime, whereas for the cases ℓ≥2 corresponds to a finite co-dimensional stable regime. Our approach here is not based on energy estimates but on a careful construction of time dependent eigenvectors and eigenvalues combined with maximum principle and semigroup pointwise estimates.
AB - In this paper, we consider the Yang-Mills heat flow on Rd×SO(d) with d≥11. Under a certain symmetry preserved by the flow, the Yang-Mills equation can be reduced to the following nonlinear equation: ∂tu=∂r2u+[Formula presented]∂ru−3(d−2)u2−(d−2)r2u3, and (r,t)∈R+×R+. We are interested in describing the singularity formation of this parabolic equation. More precisely, we aim to construct non self-similar blowup solutions in higher dimensions d≥11, and prove that the asymptotic behavior of the solution is of the form u(r,t)∼[Formula presented]), as t→T, where Q is the steady state corresponding to the boundary conditions Q(0)=−1,Q′(0)=0 and the blowup speed λℓ satisfies λℓ(t)=(C(u0)+ot→T(1))(T−t)[Formula presented] as t→T,ℓ∈N+⁎,α>1. In particular, the case ℓ=1 corresponds to the stable type II blowup regime, whereas for the cases ℓ≥2 corresponds to a finite co-dimensional stable regime. Our approach here is not based on energy estimates but on a careful construction of time dependent eigenvectors and eigenvalues combined with maximum principle and semigroup pointwise estimates.
KW - Blowup solutions
KW - Finite time blowup
KW - Geometric heat flows
KW - Singularity
KW - Type II blowup
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216553953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85216553953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jde.2025.01.039
DO - 10.1016/j.jde.2025.01.039
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216553953
SN - 0022-0396
VL - 427
SP - 26
EP - 142
JO - Journal of Differential Equations
JF - Journal of Differential Equations
ER -