Abstract
Nonconsciously activated goals and consciously set goals produce the same outcomes by engaging similar psychological processes (Bargh, 1990; Gollwitzer & Bargh, 2005). However, nonconscious and conscious goal pursuit may have different effects on subsequent affect if goal pursuit affords an explanation, as nonconscious goal pursuit occurs in an explanatory vacuum (i.e. cannot be readily attributed to the respective goal intention). We compared self-reported affect after nonconscious versus conscious goal pursuit that either violated or conformed to a prevailing social norm. When goal-directed behavior did not require an explanation (was norm-conforming), affective experiences did not differ after nonconscious and conscious goal pursuit. However, when goal-directed behavior required an explanation (was norm-violating), nonconscious goal pursuit induced more negative affect than conscious goal pursuit.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 668-675 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2006 |
Keywords
- Affective experience
- Automatic goal pursuit
- Conscious goal pursuit
- Explanatory vacuum
- Norm-violating behavior
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science