NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS OF INTEGRATED TIME SERIES:A RECONSIDERATION

Valentina Corradi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Abstract. In this paper I reconsider two of the questions raised by Granger and Hallman (Nonlinear transformations of integrated time series. J. Time Ser. Anal. 12 (1991), 207–24):(i) If Xt is I(1) and Zt=h(Xt), is Zt also I(1)? (ii) Can Xt and h(Xt) be cointegrated? The distinction between I(1) and I(0) processes is replaced by the distinction between long memory and short memory processes, where for short memory I mean strong mixing. By exploiting the fact that random walks (with positive trend component) are martingales (submartingales) and are also first‐order Markov, I show that (a) unbounded convex (concave) and strictly monotonic transformations of random walks are always long memory processes, (b) polynomial, strictly convex (concave) transformations of random walks display a unit root component, but the first differences of such transformations need not be short memory, and (c) Xt and h(Xt), with h an unbounded convex (concave) or strictly monotonic function, can never be cointegrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)539-549
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Time Series Analysis
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1995

Keywords

  • Cointegration
  • Doob decomposition
  • Markov property
  • strong mixing
  • submartingales

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS OF INTEGRATED TIME SERIES:A RECONSIDERATION'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this