Abstract
Background: Peer physical examinations (PPEs) are often used to teach health assessment (HA) skills in undergraduate nursing education; however, the use of standardized patients (SPs) has been shown to have a greater impact on cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning. Method: Survey results from students who completed their HA final head-to-toe assessment evaluation using PPEs versus SPs were compared in this mixed-method descriptive study. Results: Students who used SPs indicated their assessment required more critical thinking and less memorization compared with those who used PPEs for their HA final head-to-toe assessment evaluation (p < .05). Conclusion: The use of SPs and case-based scenarios is an innovative teaching modality that can improve undergraduate nursing students' critical thinking and assessment skills.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 368-376 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Clinical Simulation in Nursing |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Critical thinking
- Health assessment
- Nursing education
- Simulation
- Standardized patients
- Undergraduate nursing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Modeling and Simulation
- Education
- Nursing (miscellaneous)