On blame and reciprocity: Theory and experiments

Boğaçhan Çelen, Andrew Schotter, Mariana Blanco

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The theory of reciprocity is predicated on the assumption that people are willing to reward kind acts and to punish unkind ones. This assumption raises the question of what kindness is. In this paper, we offer a novel definition of kindness based on a notion of blame. This notion states that for player j to judge whether or not player i is kind to him, player j has to put himself in the position of player i, and ask if he would act in a manner that is worse than what he believes player i does. If player j would act in a worse manner than player i, then we say that player j does not blame player i. If, however, player j would be nicer than player i, then we say that player j blames player i. We believe this notion is a natural, intuitive and empirically functional way to explain the motives of people engaging in reciprocal behavior. After developing the conceptual framework, we test this concept by using data from two laboratory experiments and find significant support for the theory.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)62-92
    Number of pages31
    JournalJournal of Economic Theory
    Volume169
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2017

    Keywords

    • Altruism
    • Blame
    • Psychological games
    • Reciprocity

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On blame and reciprocity: Theory and experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this