TY - JOUR
T1 - On gambling research, social science and the consequences of commercial gambling
AU - Livingstone, Charles
AU - Adams, Peter
AU - Cassidy, Rebecca
AU - Markham, Francis
AU - Reith, Gerda
AU - Rintoul, Angela
AU - Dow Schüll, Natasha
AU - Woolley, Richard
AU - Young, Martin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018/1/2
Y1 - 2018/1/2
N2 - Social, political, economic, geographic and cultural processes related to the significant growth of the gambling industries have, in recent years, been the subject of a growing body of research. This body of research has highlighted relationships between social class and gambling expenditure, as well as the design, marketing and location of gambling products and businesses. It has also demonstrated the regressive nature of much gambling revenue, illuminating the influence that large gambling businesses have had on government policy and on researchers, including research priorities, agendas and outcomes. Recently, critics have contended that although such scholarship has produced important insights about the operations and effects of gambling businesses, it is ideologically motivated and lacks scientific rigour. This response explains some basic theoretical and disciplinary concepts that such critique misunderstands, and argues for the value of social, political, economic, geographic and cultural perspectives to the broader, interdisciplinary field of gambling research.
AB - Social, political, economic, geographic and cultural processes related to the significant growth of the gambling industries have, in recent years, been the subject of a growing body of research. This body of research has highlighted relationships between social class and gambling expenditure, as well as the design, marketing and location of gambling products and businesses. It has also demonstrated the regressive nature of much gambling revenue, illuminating the influence that large gambling businesses have had on government policy and on researchers, including research priorities, agendas and outcomes. Recently, critics have contended that although such scholarship has produced important insights about the operations and effects of gambling businesses, it is ideologically motivated and lacks scientific rigour. This response explains some basic theoretical and disciplinary concepts that such critique misunderstands, and argues for the value of social, political, economic, geographic and cultural perspectives to the broader, interdisciplinary field of gambling research.
KW - Gambling
KW - anthropology
KW - political economy
KW - social science
KW - sociology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030177751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030177751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14459795.2017.1377748
DO - 10.1080/14459795.2017.1377748
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85030177751
SN - 1445-9795
VL - 18
SP - 56
EP - 68
JO - International Gambling Studies
JF - International Gambling Studies
IS - 1
ER -