TY - JOUR
T1 - On non-optimally expanding sets in Grassmann graphs
AU - Dinur, Irit
AU - Khot, Subhash
AU - Kindler, Guy
AU - Minzer, Dor
AU - Safra, Muli
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by ISF grant no. 1692/13.
Funding Information:
Supported by ISF grant 2013/17, BSF grant 2016414 and Blavatnik fund. Acknowledgements
Funding Information:
Supported by an ISF-UGC grant 1399/14 and BSF grant 2014371.
Funding Information:
Supported by the NSF Award CCF-1422159, the Simons Collaboration on Algorithms and Geometry and the Simons Investigator Award.
Funding Information:
This work was done while the author was a Ph.D. student at the school of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, and was supported by Clore scholarship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - We study the structure of non-expanding sets in the Grassmann graph. We put forth a hypothesis stating that every small set whose expansion is smaller than 1–δ must be correlated with one of a specified list of sets which are isomorphic to smaller Grassmann graphs. We develop a framework of Fourier analysis for analyzing functions over the Grassmann graph, and prove that our hypothesis holds for all sets whose expansion is below 3/4. Our work is motivated by [DKK+18], wherein the authors show that a linearity agreement hypothesis implies an NP-hardness gap of 1/2–ε vs. ε for Unique Games and other inapproximability results. Barak, Kothari and Steurer show that the hypothesis in this work implies the linearity agreement hypothesis [DKK+18]. Following initial publication of this work, our hypothesis was proved in [KMS18].
AB - We study the structure of non-expanding sets in the Grassmann graph. We put forth a hypothesis stating that every small set whose expansion is smaller than 1–δ must be correlated with one of a specified list of sets which are isomorphic to smaller Grassmann graphs. We develop a framework of Fourier analysis for analyzing functions over the Grassmann graph, and prove that our hypothesis holds for all sets whose expansion is below 3/4. Our work is motivated by [DKK+18], wherein the authors show that a linearity agreement hypothesis implies an NP-hardness gap of 1/2–ε vs. ε for Unique Games and other inapproximability results. Barak, Kothari and Steurer show that the hypothesis in this work implies the linearity agreement hypothesis [DKK+18]. Following initial publication of this work, our hypothesis was proved in [KMS18].
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107671320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107671320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11856-021-2164-7
DO - 10.1007/s11856-021-2164-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107671320
SN - 0021-2172
VL - 243
SP - 377
EP - 420
JO - Israel Journal of Mathematics
JF - Israel Journal of Mathematics
IS - 1
ER -