TY - JOUR
T1 - Operationalizing the Measuring What Matters Spirituality Quality Metric in a Population of Hospitalized, Critically Ill Patients and Their Family Members
AU - AAHPM Writing Group
AU - Aslakson, Rebecca A.
AU - Kweku, Josephine
AU - Kinnison, Malonnie
AU - Singh, Sarabdeep
AU - Crowe, Thomas Y.
AU - Ast, Katherine
AU - Elk, Ronit
AU - Garner, Kimberly K.
AU - Gramling, Robert
AU - Grudzen, Corita
AU - Kamal, Arif H.
AU - Lamba, Sangeeta
AU - LeBlanc, Thomas W.
AU - Rhodes, Ramona L.
AU - Roeland, Eric
AU - Schulman-Green, Dena
AU - Unroe, Kathleen T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - Context Measuring What Matters (MWM) quality indicators support measurement of the percentage of patients who have spiritual discussions, if desired. Objectives The objective of this study was to 1) determine the ease of, and barriers to, prospectively collecting MWM spirituality quality measure data and 2) further explore the importance of spirituality in a seriously ill, hospitalized population of critically ill patients and their family members. Methods Electronic medical record (EMR) review and cross-sectional survey of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their family members from October to December 2015. Participants were in four adult ICUs totaling 68 beds at a single academic, urban, tertiary care center which has ICU-assigned chaplains and an in-house, 24-hour, on-call chaplain. Results All patients had a “Spiritual Risk Screen” which included two questions identifying patient religion and whether a chaplain visit was desired. Approximately 2/3 of ICU patients were eligible, and there were 144 respondents (50% female; 57% patient and 43% family member), with the majority being Caucasian or African American (68% and 21%, respectively). Common religious identifications were Christian or no faith tradition (76% and 11%, respectively). Approximately half of patients had an EMR chaplain note although it did not document presence of a “spiritual discussion.” No study patients received palliative care consultation. A majority (85%) noted that spirituality was “important to them” and that prevalence remained high across respondent age, race, faith tradition, or admitting ICU. Conclusion Operationalizing the MWM spirituality quality indicator was challenging as elements of a “spiritual screening” or documentation of a “spiritual discussion” were not clearly documented in the EMR. The high prevalence of spirituality among respondents validates the importance of spirituality as a potential quality metric.
AB - Context Measuring What Matters (MWM) quality indicators support measurement of the percentage of patients who have spiritual discussions, if desired. Objectives The objective of this study was to 1) determine the ease of, and barriers to, prospectively collecting MWM spirituality quality measure data and 2) further explore the importance of spirituality in a seriously ill, hospitalized population of critically ill patients and their family members. Methods Electronic medical record (EMR) review and cross-sectional survey of intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their family members from October to December 2015. Participants were in four adult ICUs totaling 68 beds at a single academic, urban, tertiary care center which has ICU-assigned chaplains and an in-house, 24-hour, on-call chaplain. Results All patients had a “Spiritual Risk Screen” which included two questions identifying patient religion and whether a chaplain visit was desired. Approximately 2/3 of ICU patients were eligible, and there were 144 respondents (50% female; 57% patient and 43% family member), with the majority being Caucasian or African American (68% and 21%, respectively). Common religious identifications were Christian or no faith tradition (76% and 11%, respectively). Approximately half of patients had an EMR chaplain note although it did not document presence of a “spiritual discussion.” No study patients received palliative care consultation. A majority (85%) noted that spirituality was “important to them” and that prevalence remained high across respondent age, race, faith tradition, or admitting ICU. Conclusion Operationalizing the MWM spirituality quality indicator was challenging as elements of a “spiritual screening” or documentation of a “spiritual discussion” were not clearly documented in the EMR. The high prevalence of spirituality among respondents validates the importance of spirituality as a potential quality metric.
KW - Measuring What Matters quality indicators
KW - chaplaincy
KW - intensive care units
KW - spiritual care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011949120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011949120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.323
DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.323
M3 - Article
C2 - 28042059
AN - SCOPUS:85011949120
SN - 0885-3924
VL - 53
SP - 650
EP - 655
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
IS - 3
ER -