TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal management of transfers
T2 - An odd paradox
AU - Bourguignon, François
AU - Platteau, Jean Philippe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - This paper considers the case of transfers when there exists a serious preference misalignment between the transfer-maker and the beneficiary. The former wants to reduce the resulting outcome discrepancy through monitoring the use of the transfer and imposing sanctions if the discrepancy proves too large. This external discipline combines with the ’internal discipline’ of the beneficiary, that is his/her willingness and ability to align with the transfer-maker's objective. Besides the fact that costs of monitoring and sanctioning are explicitly taken into account, an original feature of our model specification is that the two types of discipline are made comparable: they can be summed up to obtain an aggregate discipline. We show that, paradoxically, an (exogenous) improvement of internal discipline may be over-compensated by a fall of external discipline. Total discipline thus decreases and the discrepancy between the actual and the intended uses of the transfer increases instead of decreasing. Another consequence is that the relationship between internal and total disciplines may be non-monotonic. These results generalize to alternative specifications of the basic model.
AB - This paper considers the case of transfers when there exists a serious preference misalignment between the transfer-maker and the beneficiary. The former wants to reduce the resulting outcome discrepancy through monitoring the use of the transfer and imposing sanctions if the discrepancy proves too large. This external discipline combines with the ’internal discipline’ of the beneficiary, that is his/her willingness and ability to align with the transfer-maker's objective. Besides the fact that costs of monitoring and sanctioning are explicitly taken into account, an original feature of our model specification is that the two types of discipline are made comparable: they can be summed up to obtain an aggregate discipline. We show that, paradoxically, an (exogenous) improvement of internal discipline may be over-compensated by a fall of external discipline. Total discipline thus decreases and the discrepancy between the actual and the intended uses of the transfer increases instead of decreasing. Another consequence is that the relationship between internal and total disciplines may be non-monotonic. These results generalize to alternative specifications of the basic model.
KW - Aid
KW - Incentives
KW - Preference misalignment
KW - Transfer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044303400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044303400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.01.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044303400
SN - 0047-2727
VL - 162
SP - 143
EP - 157
JO - Journal of Public Economics
JF - Journal of Public Economics
ER -