Out of sight, but not out of mind: 21-month-olds use syntactic information to learn verbs even in the absence of a corresponding event

Sudha Arunachalam, Emily Escovar, Melissa A. Hansen, Sandra R. Waxman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

By 27 months of age, toddlers hearing a novel verb in transitive syntax are able to (1) establish an initial representation for the verb based on its syntactic properties alone, even in the absence of a relevant visual scene, and (2) retrieve this representation later when a candidate causative referent comes into view. This ability is important considering that over 60% of the verbs that mothers produce in conversations with their children refer to events that are not currently observable. Here, we advance this finding in two ways. First, we demonstrate the same ability in 21-month-olds, who do not yet show mastery of transitive structures in their own productions. Second, we use analyses of toddlers' eye gaze to explore the time-course with which they process the novel verb and assign its referent when candidate scenes become available. These results (1) provide the first evidence that 21-month-olds establish a representation of a novel verb's meaning from syntax alone, and (2) establish that they process and assign meaning to novel verbs with a similar time-course to that for novel nouns. The findings are thus relevant to our understanding of both word learning and lexical processing of novel words.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-425
Number of pages9
JournalLanguage and Cognitive Processes
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Lexical processing
  • Word learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Out of sight, but not out of mind: 21-month-olds use syntactic information to learn verbs even in the absence of a corresponding event'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this