TY - JOUR
T1 - Ownership and performance of outpatient substance abuse treatment centers
AU - Wheeler, J. R.C.
AU - Fadel, H.
AU - D'Aunno, T. A.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - Background. Little is known about the organization and performance of outpatient substance abuse treatment (OSAT) centers. We examine several performance measures of OSAT units, including clients treated, services provided, revenue sources, financial performance, and access to care, in relation to ownership of the center. Methods. Data were drawn from a national random sample of 575 OSAT centers (85.8% response rate) participating in a telephone survey conducted in 1988. Analysis of variance by ownership was conducted on each performance measure, with differences subjected to tests of statistical significance. Results. Descriptive results show that major funding sources differ by ownership. Private for-profit centers generate higher profits, charge higher prices, and achieve higher levels of financial performance than public and not-for-profit centers. Public centers provide better access to care for persons who are unable to pay. Conclusions. There appear to be substantial and interrelated differences by ownership type in the financing and operation of OSAT units.
AB - Background. Little is known about the organization and performance of outpatient substance abuse treatment (OSAT) centers. We examine several performance measures of OSAT units, including clients treated, services provided, revenue sources, financial performance, and access to care, in relation to ownership of the center. Methods. Data were drawn from a national random sample of 575 OSAT centers (85.8% response rate) participating in a telephone survey conducted in 1988. Analysis of variance by ownership was conducted on each performance measure, with differences subjected to tests of statistical significance. Results. Descriptive results show that major funding sources differ by ownership. Private for-profit centers generate higher profits, charge higher prices, and achieve higher levels of financial performance than public and not-for-profit centers. Public centers provide better access to care for persons who are unable to pay. Conclusions. There appear to be substantial and interrelated differences by ownership type in the financing and operation of OSAT units.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026692797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026692797&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.82.5.711
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.82.5.711
M3 - Article
C2 - 1314520
AN - SCOPUS:0026692797
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 82
SP - 711
EP - 718
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 5
ER -